We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Validation Studies
Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography: A Useful Tool for Diagnosis of Treatment-Naïve Quiescent Choroidal Neovascularization.
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2016 September
PURPOSE: To describe the optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) features of treatment-naïve quiescent choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration, and to estimate the detection rate for neovascularization by means of OCT-A.
DESIGN: Diagnostic tool validity assessment.
METHODS: Treatment-naïve quiescent CNV were identified from a pool of patients at 2 retina referral centers. Patients underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination including fluorescein angiography, indocyanine green angiography, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, and OCT-A. Detection rates of CNV by means of OCT-A were estimated with a second cohort of patients without CNV (negative controls).
RESULTS: Twenty-two eyes of 20 consecutive patients with quiescent CNV were included. In 4 out of 22 eyes it was not possible to classify the CNV "shape," "core," "margin," and "location," either because the vascular network was not clearly shown (3 cases) or because it was not visible at all (1 case). CNV shape on OCT-A was rated as circular in 8 eyes and irregular in 10 eyes. CNV core was visible in 2 eyes. CNV margin was considered as well defined in 15 eyes and poorly defined in 3 eyes. CNV margin showed small loops in 9 eyes and large loops in the other 6 eyes. CNV location was foveal-sparing in 12 eyes. Sensitivity and specificity of quiescent CNV detection by OCT-A turned out to be 81.8% and 100%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: OCT-A allows the clinician to noninvasively identify treatment-naïve quiescent CNV and may be considered as a useful tool to guide the frequency of return visits and, possibly, make treatment decisions.
DESIGN: Diagnostic tool validity assessment.
METHODS: Treatment-naïve quiescent CNV were identified from a pool of patients at 2 retina referral centers. Patients underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination including fluorescein angiography, indocyanine green angiography, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, and OCT-A. Detection rates of CNV by means of OCT-A were estimated with a second cohort of patients without CNV (negative controls).
RESULTS: Twenty-two eyes of 20 consecutive patients with quiescent CNV were included. In 4 out of 22 eyes it was not possible to classify the CNV "shape," "core," "margin," and "location," either because the vascular network was not clearly shown (3 cases) or because it was not visible at all (1 case). CNV shape on OCT-A was rated as circular in 8 eyes and irregular in 10 eyes. CNV core was visible in 2 eyes. CNV margin was considered as well defined in 15 eyes and poorly defined in 3 eyes. CNV margin showed small loops in 9 eyes and large loops in the other 6 eyes. CNV location was foveal-sparing in 12 eyes. Sensitivity and specificity of quiescent CNV detection by OCT-A turned out to be 81.8% and 100%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: OCT-A allows the clinician to noninvasively identify treatment-naïve quiescent CNV and may be considered as a useful tool to guide the frequency of return visits and, possibly, make treatment decisions.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Haemodynamic monitoring during noncardiac surgery: past, present, and future.Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2024 April 31
2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.Circulation 2024 May 9
Obesity pharmacotherapy in older adults: a narrative review of evidence.International Journal of Obesity 2024 May 7
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app