Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Review
Systematic Review
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Planned delivery at 37 weeks in twins: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of planned delivery at 37 weeks in women with twin gestations compared to expectant management.

METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Searches were performed in electronic databases. We included all RCTs of uncomplicated early term twin gestations with intact membranes who were randomized to planned delivery at 37 weeks or control (i.e. expectant management until at least 38(0) weeks). The primary outcome was the rate of cesarean delivery.

RESULTS: Two trials (271 women) were analyzed. Women with twin gestations who had planned delivery at 37 weeks had similar rates of cesarean delivery compared to controls [51.9 versus 49.3%; relative risk (RR): 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83-1.32]. Furthermore, no differences in all secondary outcomes were detected, except for a significantly lower rate of serious adverse infant outcomes in the women who had planned delivery at 37 weeks compared to controls (4.7 versus 12.2%; RR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.20-0.76).

CONCLUSIONS: Planned delivery at 37 weeks in twins is associated with a similar risk of cesarean delivery and lower risk of serious adverse infant outcomes, compared to expectant management until at least 38 weeks.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app