We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Clinical accuracy of imaging techniques for talar neck malunion.
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 2008 July
OBJECTIVES: To compare the ability of plain radiographs, computed tomography (CT), and radiostereometric analysis (RSA) to detect changes in talus fracture fragment position and alignment using an in vitro model.
METHODS: Eight cadaveric tali were osteotomized at the talar neck. RSA beads were inserted into each talar fragment. The talus was anatomically reduced and stabilized with a pair of 3.5-mm cortical screws. Plain radiographs and RSA films were obtained. The fragments were then displaced and rotated to create a varus and supination deformity, and screw fixation was repeated in nonanatomic alignment. Displacement and rotation were directly measured. Plain radiographs and RSA were repeated, and CT scans were obtained. The RSA measurements were interpreted in a blinded fashion by an experienced researcher. Two independent blinded orthopedic trauma surgeons measured the displacement and rotation using plain films and CT. The results from each radiographic measurement were compared to the measured displacement and rotation using ANOVA.
RESULTS: Plain radiographs, RSA, and CT all underestimated the measured talar neck displacement and rotation. Radiographs underestimated displacement by 5.0 +/- 2.9 mm, RSA by 5.9 +/- 2.0 mm, and CT scans by 2.4 +/- 4.8 mm (P < 0.05). Rotation was also underestimated by all 3 techniques, but the differences among techniques were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: The most accurate imaging technique to measure displacement in talar neck malunion is CT scan. RSA was less useful as an imaging technique in this study.
METHODS: Eight cadaveric tali were osteotomized at the talar neck. RSA beads were inserted into each talar fragment. The talus was anatomically reduced and stabilized with a pair of 3.5-mm cortical screws. Plain radiographs and RSA films were obtained. The fragments were then displaced and rotated to create a varus and supination deformity, and screw fixation was repeated in nonanatomic alignment. Displacement and rotation were directly measured. Plain radiographs and RSA were repeated, and CT scans were obtained. The RSA measurements were interpreted in a blinded fashion by an experienced researcher. Two independent blinded orthopedic trauma surgeons measured the displacement and rotation using plain films and CT. The results from each radiographic measurement were compared to the measured displacement and rotation using ANOVA.
RESULTS: Plain radiographs, RSA, and CT all underestimated the measured talar neck displacement and rotation. Radiographs underestimated displacement by 5.0 +/- 2.9 mm, RSA by 5.9 +/- 2.0 mm, and CT scans by 2.4 +/- 4.8 mm (P < 0.05). Rotation was also underestimated by all 3 techniques, but the differences among techniques were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: The most accurate imaging technique to measure displacement in talar neck malunion is CT scan. RSA was less useful as an imaging technique in this study.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Consensus Statement on Vitamin D Status Assessment and Supplementation: Whys, Whens, and Hows.Endocrine Reviews 2024 April 28
The Tricuspid Valve: A Review of Pathology, Imaging, and Current Treatment Options: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 26
British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults.Gut 2024 April 17
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Ventilator Waveforms May Give Clues to Expiratory Muscle Activity.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2024 April 25
Systemic lupus erythematosus.Lancet 2024 April 18
Acute Kidney Injury and Electrolyte Imbalances Caused by Dapagliflozin Short-Term Use.Pharmaceuticals 2024 March 27
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app