We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Detection of liver metastases by pulse inversion harmonic imaging during Levovist late phase: comparison with conventional ultrasound and helical CT in 160 patients.
European Radiology 2003 March
The aim of this study was to evaluate capabilities of pulse inversion harmonic imaging (PIHI) with Levovist in detection of liver metastases compared with conventional ultrasound (US) and helical CT (HCT). One hundred sixty consecutive patients with known malignancies were evaluated by conventional US, PIHI 2 min (40 patients) or 4 min (120 patients) after Levovist injection and HCT. Conspicuity and number of the identified metastatic lesions were evaluated and assessed by statistical analysis (significance p<0.05). Mean diameter of the smallest identified metastases was computed for conventional US, PIHI and HCT. In cases where PIHI revealed more lesions suspicious for metastases than HCT, intraopertive US with surgical biopsy or 3-6-month US follow-up were performed to confirm diagnosis. Images were stored on magneto-optical disk and evaluated off-line by a dedicated software. Metastases conspicuity was significantly improved on PIHI if compared with conventional US ( p<0.05). In 49 patients all the employed imaging techniques did not reveal any lesion, whereas in the remaining 111 patients, 28 patients revealed more than five metastatic lesions and 83 patients presented from one to five metastatic lesions. In comparison with conventional US, PIHI revealed more metastases in 39/83 (47%), the same number in 44/83 (53%) and a lower number in 0/83 (0%) patients. In comparison with HCT, PIHI revealed more metastases in 10/83 (12%), the same number in 61/83 (74%) and a lower number in 12/83 (14%) patients. Average number +/- SD (standard deviation) of confirmed metastases for patients was 2.21+/-1.6 for conventional US, 3.1+/-2.44 for PIHI and 3.05+/-2.41 for HCT. The difference between PIHI and conventional US was statistically significant ( p<0.0001), whereas the difference between PIHI and HCT was not significant ( p=0.9). The smallest identified metastases presented 3-mm mean diameter on PIHI, 5-mm on HCT and 7-mm on conventional US. PIHI with Levovist is a reliable technique in metastases detection.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Classifications, Pathophysiology, Diagnoses and Management.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 13
Executive Summary: State-of-the-Art Review: Unintended Consequences: Risk of Opportunistic Infections Associated with Long-term Glucocorticoid Therapies in Adults.Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 April 11
Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.Epilepsia 2024 April 13
Finerenone: From the Mechanism of Action to Clinical Use in Kidney Disease.Pharmaceuticals 2024 March 27
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app