We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Botulinum toxin for simple motor tics: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial.
Neurology 2001 March 14
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of injections of botulinum toxin on simple motor tics.
BACKGROUND: Case series with unblinded assessments have reported improvement in tic frequency and associated urge with botulinum toxin.
METHODS: Patients with suitable simple motor tics were randomized to receive botulinum toxin and placebo in a double blind, crossover design. All outcomes compared week 2 to baseline measurements. The primary outcome measure was the number of treated tics per minute on a videotape segment. Secondary outcome measures were number of untreated tics per minute, the Shapiro Tourette Syndrome Severity Scale score, a numerical assessment of the urge to perform the treated tic (0 to 4), the premonitory sensation associated with the treated tic (0 to 4), and the patient's global impression of change.
RESULTS: Eighteen patients completed the study. The median relative change in treated tics per minute with botulinum toxin was -0.39 (or a 39% reduction) versus 0.058 (or a 5.8% increase) with placebo (net effect -0.37, p = 0.0007). The average change in urge scores (score range 0 to 4) was -0.46 in the treatment phase and +0.49 in the placebo phase (net effect 0.94, p = 0.02). Other secondary outcome measures were not significantly different between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Botulinum toxin reduced treated tic frequency and the urge associated with the treated tic. Despite these changes, patients did not report an overall benefit from the treatment. Careful consideration of the contribution of the target tic to the patient's disability is needed before making treatment decisions.
BACKGROUND: Case series with unblinded assessments have reported improvement in tic frequency and associated urge with botulinum toxin.
METHODS: Patients with suitable simple motor tics were randomized to receive botulinum toxin and placebo in a double blind, crossover design. All outcomes compared week 2 to baseline measurements. The primary outcome measure was the number of treated tics per minute on a videotape segment. Secondary outcome measures were number of untreated tics per minute, the Shapiro Tourette Syndrome Severity Scale score, a numerical assessment of the urge to perform the treated tic (0 to 4), the premonitory sensation associated with the treated tic (0 to 4), and the patient's global impression of change.
RESULTS: Eighteen patients completed the study. The median relative change in treated tics per minute with botulinum toxin was -0.39 (or a 39% reduction) versus 0.058 (or a 5.8% increase) with placebo (net effect -0.37, p = 0.0007). The average change in urge scores (score range 0 to 4) was -0.46 in the treatment phase and +0.49 in the placebo phase (net effect 0.94, p = 0.02). Other secondary outcome measures were not significantly different between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Botulinum toxin reduced treated tic frequency and the urge associated with the treated tic. Despite these changes, patients did not report an overall benefit from the treatment. Careful consideration of the contribution of the target tic to the patient's disability is needed before making treatment decisions.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Executive Summary: State-of-the-Art Review: Unintended Consequences: Risk of Opportunistic Infections Associated with Long-term Glucocorticoid Therapies in Adults.Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 April 11
Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.Epilepsia 2024 April 13
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Classifications, Pathophysiology, Diagnoses and Management.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app