We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
English Abstract
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
[Effects of age, body weight, and ventilatory pattern on the difference between arterial and end-tidal PCO2].
Minerva Anestesiologica 1994 July
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of physiological ventilatory patterns on P(a-ET)CO2 gradient and on the alveolar dead space production during controlled mechanical ventilation.
DESIGN: Prospective and experimental comparison among three different ventilatory settings in three different groups of subjects.
SETTING: General surgery's operating-theatre in university hospital.
PATIENTS: Twenty-eight patients subdivided randomly in 3 groups differing for ventilatory setting. I group: constant tidal volume (VC = 8 ml.kg-1) and 3 different respiratory frequencies (f = 10, 12 and 14 breaths.min-1); II group: constant ventilation (112 ml.kg-1) but VC and f modified in three different ways; III group: inspiratory volume was set to give an end-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2) of about 35 mmHg. The cases were subdivided, on the basis of P(a-ET)CO2 distribution, in three groups: group with values larger than mean plus 1 standard deviation, group with values between +/- 1 standard deviation and group with values lower than mean minus 1 standard deviation. Moreover in two homogeneous groups for age.
INTERVENTIONS: General surgery but not important because measures were performed before surgical manoeuvres.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Anthropometrical data (age and body weight), PaCO2, PETCO2, heart rate, invasive arterial pressure, ventilatory parameters and airway pressure were collected for every subject and ventilatory setting; arterial to end-tidal difference P(a-ET)CO2 and P(a-ET)CO2.PaCO2(-1) were calculated during data analysis. The P(a-ETFCO2 and P(a-ET)CO2.PaCO2(-1) values were not significantly different among the three different ventilatory patterns both in the first and in the second group. P(a-ET)CO2 values were significantly correlated with age, body weight and airway pressure. These parameters were correlated significantly also with P(a-ET)CO2.PaCO2(-1) values.
CONCLUSIONS: Ventilatory setting, used in a normal physiological range, don't affect P(a-ET)CO2 difference during mechanical ventilation. Age, body weight and airway pressure of the patient must be considered to obtain a correct value of PaCO2 by the measure of PETCO2.
DESIGN: Prospective and experimental comparison among three different ventilatory settings in three different groups of subjects.
SETTING: General surgery's operating-theatre in university hospital.
PATIENTS: Twenty-eight patients subdivided randomly in 3 groups differing for ventilatory setting. I group: constant tidal volume (VC = 8 ml.kg-1) and 3 different respiratory frequencies (f = 10, 12 and 14 breaths.min-1); II group: constant ventilation (112 ml.kg-1) but VC and f modified in three different ways; III group: inspiratory volume was set to give an end-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2) of about 35 mmHg. The cases were subdivided, on the basis of P(a-ET)CO2 distribution, in three groups: group with values larger than mean plus 1 standard deviation, group with values between +/- 1 standard deviation and group with values lower than mean minus 1 standard deviation. Moreover in two homogeneous groups for age.
INTERVENTIONS: General surgery but not important because measures were performed before surgical manoeuvres.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Anthropometrical data (age and body weight), PaCO2, PETCO2, heart rate, invasive arterial pressure, ventilatory parameters and airway pressure were collected for every subject and ventilatory setting; arterial to end-tidal difference P(a-ET)CO2 and P(a-ET)CO2.PaCO2(-1) were calculated during data analysis. The P(a-ETFCO2 and P(a-ET)CO2.PaCO2(-1) values were not significantly different among the three different ventilatory patterns both in the first and in the second group. P(a-ET)CO2 values were significantly correlated with age, body weight and airway pressure. These parameters were correlated significantly also with P(a-ET)CO2.PaCO2(-1) values.
CONCLUSIONS: Ventilatory setting, used in a normal physiological range, don't affect P(a-ET)CO2 difference during mechanical ventilation. Age, body weight and airway pressure of the patient must be considered to obtain a correct value of PaCO2 by the measure of PETCO2.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System: From History to Practice of a Secular Topic.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 5
Albumin: a comprehensive review and practical guideline for clinical use.European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2024 April 13
Revascularization Strategy in Myocardial Infarction with Multivessel Disease.Journal of Clinical Medicine 2024 March 27
Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.Epilepsia 2024 April 13
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app