We have located links that may give you full text access.
The importance of combined HPV and CINtec® PLUS genotyping testing for p16 in women with cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
INTRODUCTION: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for p16INK4A (p16) is a reliable surrogate test for the presence of a high-risk, potentially transformative human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in precursor and malignant lesions of the cervix. The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in cervical cells caused by persistent HPV infection, by IHC (p16 protein) by comparison with HPV genotyping.
PATIENTS, MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included female patients aged between 26 and 57 years who presented to a public hospital, with complaints related to the genital area, namely vaginal bleeding and dyspareunia. After selecting the patients, samples were subjected to cytological testing and IHC for p16 and for the determination of HPV types.
RESULTS: The relationship between HPV status and p16 status was statistically significant (p=0.0001), of the 41 patients, 53.7% were HPV positive, respectively 56.1% were p16 positive, the agreement relationship between the two indicators was very high (weighted kappa: 0.951). The clinical performance of CINtec® PLUS triage for p16 shows a high positive predictive value (PPV) and a high negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.7% and 100%, respectively, as regards HPV.
CONCLUSIONS: The p16 marker (CINtec® PLUS) can be used as a prognostic biomarker and provides clinical usefulness through increased sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) in the triage of women at risk of developing precancerous lesions, compared to cytology that is based on morphology, but has a rather low Se and high Sp, while HPV testing is very sensitive but slightly more specific.
PATIENTS, MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included female patients aged between 26 and 57 years who presented to a public hospital, with complaints related to the genital area, namely vaginal bleeding and dyspareunia. After selecting the patients, samples were subjected to cytological testing and IHC for p16 and for the determination of HPV types.
RESULTS: The relationship between HPV status and p16 status was statistically significant (p=0.0001), of the 41 patients, 53.7% were HPV positive, respectively 56.1% were p16 positive, the agreement relationship between the two indicators was very high (weighted kappa: 0.951). The clinical performance of CINtec® PLUS triage for p16 shows a high positive predictive value (PPV) and a high negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.7% and 100%, respectively, as regards HPV.
CONCLUSIONS: The p16 marker (CINtec® PLUS) can be used as a prognostic biomarker and provides clinical usefulness through increased sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) in the triage of women at risk of developing precancerous lesions, compared to cytology that is based on morphology, but has a rather low Se and high Sp, while HPV testing is very sensitive but slightly more specific.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Systemic lupus erythematosus.Lancet 2024 April 18
Should renin-angiotensin system inhibitors be held prior to major surgery?British Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 May
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Classifications, Pathophysiology, Diagnoses and Management.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app