We have located links that may give you full text access.
Is The Modular Dynamic System as Effective as Classical Dynamic Systems in Long Segment Dynamic Thoracolumbar Stabilization?
Turkish Neurosurgery 2024
AIM: To evaluate the outcomes of dynamic stabilization in the multilevel degenerative spondylotic spine, and to compare the two dynamic systems (Dynesys® and Orthrus®) to reveal the increasing role of dynamic systems in the management of the degenerative spine.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 74 patients who received dynamic stabilization for degenerative pathologies were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic details: preoperative data including neurological status, pain scores, and radiology; and intraoperative data including blood loss, duration of surgery, complications, and postoperative data including the neurologic status, duration of hospital stay, and pain scores were examined.
RESULTS: Patients in both groups showed statistically significant improvements in their Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores. Significant corrections of thoracic kyphosis (T2-T12), the sagittal vertical axis, and T10-L2 thoracolumbar kyphosis were obtained in our cohort (p < 0.05). A total of 4 patients received revision surgery due to screw loosening. Patients were discharged after 3-4 days and mobilized on the first postoperative day.
CONCLUSION: We did not experience any serious issues in terms of stabilization in the cases in which we employed both systems. Our patients' clinical results were satisfactory in both systems. Existing systems can be used safely even in long-segment stabilization surgeries.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 74 patients who received dynamic stabilization for degenerative pathologies were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic details: preoperative data including neurological status, pain scores, and radiology; and intraoperative data including blood loss, duration of surgery, complications, and postoperative data including the neurologic status, duration of hospital stay, and pain scores were examined.
RESULTS: Patients in both groups showed statistically significant improvements in their Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores. Significant corrections of thoracic kyphosis (T2-T12), the sagittal vertical axis, and T10-L2 thoracolumbar kyphosis were obtained in our cohort (p < 0.05). A total of 4 patients received revision surgery due to screw loosening. Patients were discharged after 3-4 days and mobilized on the first postoperative day.
CONCLUSION: We did not experience any serious issues in terms of stabilization in the cases in which we employed both systems. Our patients' clinical results were satisfactory in both systems. Existing systems can be used safely even in long-segment stabilization surgeries.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Classifications, Pathophysiology, Diagnoses and Management.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 13
Executive Summary: State-of-the-Art Review: Unintended Consequences: Risk of Opportunistic Infections Associated with Long-term Glucocorticoid Therapies in Adults.Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 April 11
Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.Epilepsia 2024 April 13
Finerenone: From the Mechanism of Action to Clinical Use in Kidney Disease.Pharmaceuticals 2024 March 27
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app