We have located links that may give you full text access.
Validity of the Triglyceride-Glucose Indices for Predicting the Severity of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Nondiabetic Chronic Coronary Syndrome.
Critical Pathways in Cardiology 2024 Februrary 2
BACKGROUND: The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index was shown to be an independent predictor of coronary artery disease (CAD) progression and prognosis. However, whether the TyG index can predict the severity of CAD in nondiabetic patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) remains unclear.
METHODS: A total of 118 individuals who underwent elective coronary angiography (CA) were classified into group A (59 with coronary lesions) and group B (59 with normal coronary arteries; as a control group) after CA, laboratory tests for fasting and the postprandial (PP) TyG index. The complexity of CAD was determined by the SYNTAX score (SYNTAX score > 22 indicated moderate-high risk), and patients diagnosed diabetes or prediabetes were excluded.
RESULTS: The TyG index was not related to the SYNTAX score in groups A and B; however, in the CAD group with an LDL concentration <70 mg/dl (group A1), a fasting TyG index ≥ 8.25 and a PP TyG index ≥ 11 could predict moderate-high SYNTAX risk score; in addition, the odds ratio was 4.3 times higher, and the relative risk was 1.8 times greater (OR=4.3, RR=1.8, 95% CI=1.4-13.5 p<0.05) for individuals with a higher fasting TyG index ≥8.25 to have a moderate-high SYNTAX risk score. Individuals with a higher PP TyG index ≥11 had odds ratio of 2.6 times higher and a relative risk of 1.4 times greater to have moderate-high SYNTAX risk score.
CONCLUSIONS: Both fasting and postprandial TyG levels were associated with greater coronary anatomical complexity (SYNTAX score > 22) in nondiabetic chronic coronary patients with LDL <70 mg/dL. Fasting and the postprandial TyG indices can serve as noninvasive predictors of CAD complexity in nondiabetic patients with LDL <70 mg/dl and could change the management and therapeutic approach.
METHODS: A total of 118 individuals who underwent elective coronary angiography (CA) were classified into group A (59 with coronary lesions) and group B (59 with normal coronary arteries; as a control group) after CA, laboratory tests for fasting and the postprandial (PP) TyG index. The complexity of CAD was determined by the SYNTAX score (SYNTAX score > 22 indicated moderate-high risk), and patients diagnosed diabetes or prediabetes were excluded.
RESULTS: The TyG index was not related to the SYNTAX score in groups A and B; however, in the CAD group with an LDL concentration <70 mg/dl (group A1), a fasting TyG index ≥ 8.25 and a PP TyG index ≥ 11 could predict moderate-high SYNTAX risk score; in addition, the odds ratio was 4.3 times higher, and the relative risk was 1.8 times greater (OR=4.3, RR=1.8, 95% CI=1.4-13.5 p<0.05) for individuals with a higher fasting TyG index ≥8.25 to have a moderate-high SYNTAX risk score. Individuals with a higher PP TyG index ≥11 had odds ratio of 2.6 times higher and a relative risk of 1.4 times greater to have moderate-high SYNTAX risk score.
CONCLUSIONS: Both fasting and postprandial TyG levels were associated with greater coronary anatomical complexity (SYNTAX score > 22) in nondiabetic chronic coronary patients with LDL <70 mg/dL. Fasting and the postprandial TyG indices can serve as noninvasive predictors of CAD complexity in nondiabetic patients with LDL <70 mg/dl and could change the management and therapeutic approach.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Haemodynamic monitoring during noncardiac surgery: past, present, and future.Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2024 April 31
Obesity pharmacotherapy in older adults: a narrative review of evidence.International Journal of Obesity 2024 May 7
2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.Circulation 2024 May 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app