We have located links that may give you full text access.
Endoscopic and microscopic segmental decompression via translaminar crossover spinal approach in elderly patients.
World Neurosurgery 2019 January 29
OBJECTIVE: For an effective minimally invasive lumbar decompression we changed the routine of segmental decompression. With a high-speed drill or an ultrasound knife we create a working channel, starting at the base of the spinous process of the upper vertebra slightly above the disc level, to target and decompress the contralateral recess: the translaminar crossover decompression (TCD). This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and compare outcomes of a navigation-guided endoscopic translaminar crossover approach for segmental decompression (eTCD) in elderly patients with microscopic decompression using the same approach (mTCD).
METHODS: A total of 740 elderly patients were enrolled in a prospective cohort study design. 297 mTCD patients and 253 eTCD patients completed 1-year follow-up visits. In addition to surgical data, numeric rating scales (NRS) for back and leg pain, core outcome measures index (COMI) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were recorded preoperatively as well as three, six months and one year after surgery. MacNab criteria were supplemented by qualitative assessment of postoperative pain-free walking distance.
RESULTS: Comparison of preoperative and postoperative clinical scores showed significant improvement after TCD in both cohorts (p<0.01): ODI from 50.3% ± 12.6% to 15.5% ± 7.43%; NRS (back) from 6.9 ± 1.9 to 2.5 ± 1.3; NRS (leg) from 8.0 ± 0.85 to 1.6 ± 0.33; COMI (back) from 7.8 ± 2.0 to 2.7 ± 1.5 whereas there were no significant differences in outcome between the cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS: TCD inherently eliminates central stenosis and facilitates the decompression of both recesses via mutual undercutting while preserving facet joint integrity.
METHODS: A total of 740 elderly patients were enrolled in a prospective cohort study design. 297 mTCD patients and 253 eTCD patients completed 1-year follow-up visits. In addition to surgical data, numeric rating scales (NRS) for back and leg pain, core outcome measures index (COMI) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were recorded preoperatively as well as three, six months and one year after surgery. MacNab criteria were supplemented by qualitative assessment of postoperative pain-free walking distance.
RESULTS: Comparison of preoperative and postoperative clinical scores showed significant improvement after TCD in both cohorts (p<0.01): ODI from 50.3% ± 12.6% to 15.5% ± 7.43%; NRS (back) from 6.9 ± 1.9 to 2.5 ± 1.3; NRS (leg) from 8.0 ± 0.85 to 1.6 ± 0.33; COMI (back) from 7.8 ± 2.0 to 2.7 ± 1.5 whereas there were no significant differences in outcome between the cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS: TCD inherently eliminates central stenosis and facilitates the decompression of both recesses via mutual undercutting while preserving facet joint integrity.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Review article: Recent advances in ascites and acute kidney injury management in cirrhosis.Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2024 March 26
Executive Summary: State-of-the-Art Review: Unintended Consequences: Risk of Opportunistic Infections Associated with Long-term Glucocorticoid Therapies in Adults.Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 April 11
Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.Epilepsia 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app