COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Diagnosis of typhoid fever by polymerase chain reaction.
Indian Journal of Pediatrics 2007 October
OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in detecting Salmonella typhi gene sequences in blood and urine specimens and to determine the cut-off titer of Widal test using PCR as gold standard test for diagnosis of typhoid fever.
METHODS: Study included 71 children between the ages of 8 months and 14 years; 52 of them were suspected cases of typhoid fever, 11 were febrile non-typhoid controls and 8 were apparently healthy children. Nested PCR in Blood and Urine, Blood culture, Widal test and Urine culture were done and their results analyzed.
RESULTS: Among suspected typhoid cases, PCR in blood and urine had positivity of 82.7% each. Blood culture, Widal test (at cut off titer TO and/or TH > 1:160) and urine culture had positivity of 26.9%, 50% and 3.8% respectively. In one case, urine PCR was positive and blood PCR was negative. Similarly, in another case, PCR in blood was positive however urine tested negative. Considering PCR as gold standard, the antibody cut off titer was evaluated. A cut-off titer of TO > 1:80 and/or TH > 1:160 had sensitivity and specificity of 72.7% and 84.2%, while the respective figures were 50% and 89.5% when the cut-off titer was TO and/or TH > 1:160.
CONCLUSION: The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios were same for PCR based detection of S. typhi in blood and urine samples. Nested PCR had higher efficacy in detecting typhoid fever than Widal test, blood and urine cultures. A cut off titer of TO > 1:80 and/or TH > 1:160 was found to have better diagnostic value in this region.
METHODS: Study included 71 children between the ages of 8 months and 14 years; 52 of them were suspected cases of typhoid fever, 11 were febrile non-typhoid controls and 8 were apparently healthy children. Nested PCR in Blood and Urine, Blood culture, Widal test and Urine culture were done and their results analyzed.
RESULTS: Among suspected typhoid cases, PCR in blood and urine had positivity of 82.7% each. Blood culture, Widal test (at cut off titer TO and/or TH > 1:160) and urine culture had positivity of 26.9%, 50% and 3.8% respectively. In one case, urine PCR was positive and blood PCR was negative. Similarly, in another case, PCR in blood was positive however urine tested negative. Considering PCR as gold standard, the antibody cut off titer was evaluated. A cut-off titer of TO > 1:80 and/or TH > 1:160 had sensitivity and specificity of 72.7% and 84.2%, while the respective figures were 50% and 89.5% when the cut-off titer was TO and/or TH > 1:160.
CONCLUSION: The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios were same for PCR based detection of S. typhi in blood and urine samples. Nested PCR had higher efficacy in detecting typhoid fever than Widal test, blood and urine cultures. A cut off titer of TO > 1:80 and/or TH > 1:160 was found to have better diagnostic value in this region.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Management of type 2 diabetes in the new era.Hormones : International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism 2023 September 14
Beta-blocker therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction: not all patients need it.Acute and critical care. 2023 August
The pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation.Journal of Intensive Care 2023 May 24
Pharmacological Treatments in Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.JACC. Heart Failure 2023 August 26
Hypertensive Heart Failure.Journal of Clinical Medicine 2023 August 3
SGLT2 Inhibitors vs. GLP-1 Agonists to Treat the Heart, the Kidneys and the Brain.Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease 2023 July 31
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app