Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

What Is the True Impact of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis on Mortality?

INTRODUCTION: Mortality is a quality indicator that may affect expenditures. Revisions for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are, on average, more expensive and exhibit higher morbidity than aseptic-revisions, though reimbursement is similar. Therefore, we sought to determine: (1) impact on mortality rates of revision total hip (THA) and/or knee (TKA) arthroplasty performed for PJI diagnosis (septic) versus aseptic-revisions, at any point in time, and (2) mortality predictors among PJI patients.

METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 978 consecutive patients who underwent revision at a single institution (January 2015 to November 2020). All revisions were evaluated, and it was determined whether patients had a revision for PJI at any point in time or not. Two groups were compared: (1) patients with septic-revision(s) (n=350), and (2) patients who only underwent aseptic-revision(s) (n=628). Demographics and mortality status at latest follow-up (mean 3 years, range: 0 to 18 years, from first-revision ever) were assessed. Mortality status was also separately assessed among patients who exclusively had hip revision(s), or solely knee revision(s), or both. Multivariate regression analysis (Cox) was used to determine whether PJI diagnosis was an independent mortality predictor. Among PJI patients, potential mortality predictors were evaluated.

RESULTS: Overall, 65 patients died (6.6%). The septic cohort had significantly more men and American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) class-IV patients. Mortality rates were 10.9 and 4.3%, (p<0.0001) for septic- and aseptic-revision groups, respectively. After controlling for sex, ASA, and number of revisions, PJI diagnosis was a significant mortality predictor (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 2.69, 95%CI: 1.5-4.7, p=0.001). Among PJI patients, age (HR: 1.05, 95%CI: 1.01-1.08, p=0.009) and ASA (HR: 4.02, 95%CI: 1.67-9.67, p=0.002) were independent predictors.

CONCLUSION: Having a revision due to PJI diagnosis was associated with 2.5 times increased mortality. Therefore, more accurate coding capturing the complexity and morbidity of revisions for PJI diagnosis is needed.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app