We have located links that may give you full text access.
Perfusion index as a reliable parameter of vasomotor disturbance in complex regional pain syndrome.
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2018 November
BACKGROUND: Discrepancy between a patient's subjective thermal symptoms and objective measured temperature value is common in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) in clinical settings. For that reason, the diagnostic validity of a single temperature measurement method has been criticised. Several studies showed that the perfusion index (PI), which is derived from pulse oximetry, is a more sensitive and earlier indicator of sympathetic blockade than temperature measurement.
METHODS: Forty-six participants (CRPS group, n=23; healthy control group, n=23) were enrolled. CRPS patients with subjective sensation of coldness on the affected side were chosen for this study. Temperature and PI were measured at the affected and contralateral hands in the CRPS group, and right and left hands in the healthy control group. To evaluate each method's efficacy for detecting thermal symptoms, differences in the parameters (temperature: ΔT, PI: ΔPI) were compared with receiver operating characteristic curves.
RESULTS: ΔPI was significantly larger in the CRPS compared with the healthy control group (P=0.002), but ΔT was not (P=0.171). The accuracy of PI measurement for reflecting thermal symptoms was good (area under the curve for ΔPI: 0.873, P<0.0001). The optimal cut off value of ΔPI was calculated as 0.50% with a sensitivity of 78.26%, whereas the sensitivity of ΔT using the conventional criterion of ≥1°C was only 34.78%.
CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of detection of subjective abnormal thermal sensations was superior for PI compared with the temperature measurement method. PI was a more sensitive measure for detecting vasomotor symptoms in CRPS compared with temperature.
METHODS: Forty-six participants (CRPS group, n=23; healthy control group, n=23) were enrolled. CRPS patients with subjective sensation of coldness on the affected side were chosen for this study. Temperature and PI were measured at the affected and contralateral hands in the CRPS group, and right and left hands in the healthy control group. To evaluate each method's efficacy for detecting thermal symptoms, differences in the parameters (temperature: ΔT, PI: ΔPI) were compared with receiver operating characteristic curves.
RESULTS: ΔPI was significantly larger in the CRPS compared with the healthy control group (P=0.002), but ΔT was not (P=0.171). The accuracy of PI measurement for reflecting thermal symptoms was good (area under the curve for ΔPI: 0.873, P<0.0001). The optimal cut off value of ΔPI was calculated as 0.50% with a sensitivity of 78.26%, whereas the sensitivity of ΔT using the conventional criterion of ≥1°C was only 34.78%.
CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of detection of subjective abnormal thermal sensations was superior for PI compared with the temperature measurement method. PI was a more sensitive measure for detecting vasomotor symptoms in CRPS compared with temperature.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Systemic lupus erythematosus.Lancet 2024 April 18
Should renin-angiotensin system inhibitors be held prior to major surgery?British Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 May
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Classifications, Pathophysiology, Diagnoses and Management.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app