We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Breast carcinoma: MR imaging before re-excisional biopsy.
Radiology 1997 November
PURPOSE: To investigate the role of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the examination of patients after excisional biopsy of breast carcinoma before re-excision.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients underwent contrast material-enhanced MR imaging after initial excisional biopsy of breast carcinoma before further surgery.
RESULTS: The positive predictive value of MR imaging for predicting residual disease was 82%; the negative predictive value was 61%. Fourteen patients had multifocal (n = 6) or diffuse (n = 8) carcinoma. The extent of tumor was correctly identified with MR imaging alone in nine of the 14 patients, with both mammography and MR imaging in three patients, with mammography alone in one patient, and with no imaging modality in one patient. In four of the 14 patients, management was altered from re-excision to mastectomy (n = 3) or from breast-conservation therapy to mastectomy (n = 1).
CONCLUSION: MR imaging has a high positive predictive value for predicting residual tumor after excisional biopsy. The identification of mammographically and clinically unsuspected multifocal or extensive residual tumor may lend support for mastectomy rather than re-excision. However, false-negative findings due to postsurgical changes and false-positive findings due to enhancement of granulation tissue and benign breast tissue remain limitations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients underwent contrast material-enhanced MR imaging after initial excisional biopsy of breast carcinoma before further surgery.
RESULTS: The positive predictive value of MR imaging for predicting residual disease was 82%; the negative predictive value was 61%. Fourteen patients had multifocal (n = 6) or diffuse (n = 8) carcinoma. The extent of tumor was correctly identified with MR imaging alone in nine of the 14 patients, with both mammography and MR imaging in three patients, with mammography alone in one patient, and with no imaging modality in one patient. In four of the 14 patients, management was altered from re-excision to mastectomy (n = 3) or from breast-conservation therapy to mastectomy (n = 1).
CONCLUSION: MR imaging has a high positive predictive value for predicting residual tumor after excisional biopsy. The identification of mammographically and clinically unsuspected multifocal or extensive residual tumor may lend support for mastectomy rather than re-excision. However, false-negative findings due to postsurgical changes and false-positive findings due to enhancement of granulation tissue and benign breast tissue remain limitations.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Review article: Recent advances in ascites and acute kidney injury management in cirrhosis.Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2024 March 26
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app