We have located links that may give you full text access.
Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence. Report of a physician survey.
Archives of Family Medicine 1997 March
OBJECTIVE: To determine practice patterns related to the evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence (UI).
DESIGN: Stratified random sample of physicians surveyed initially by mail with telephone follow-up.
SETTING: Four counties in Central Oklahoma.
PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-five physicians in 4 specialties: family practice, internal medicine, obstetrics/gynecology, and urology.
MEASUREMENTS: Self-reported evaluation and treatment of UI and training in treatment of UI. The overall rate of response was 80%.
RESULTS: Physicians miss opportunities to identify patients with UI. Despite substantial specialty variation, behavioral treatments and medications for UI, relative to the Agency for Health Care and Policy Research clinical guidelines, are underused. More than 40% of internists and family practitioners routinely recommended absorbent pads. Only 17% of physicians were aware of the clinical guidelines.
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians identified deficiencies in their level of preparation to evaluate and treat UI. Reports of practice patterns also suggest deficiencies.
DESIGN: Stratified random sample of physicians surveyed initially by mail with telephone follow-up.
SETTING: Four counties in Central Oklahoma.
PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-five physicians in 4 specialties: family practice, internal medicine, obstetrics/gynecology, and urology.
MEASUREMENTS: Self-reported evaluation and treatment of UI and training in treatment of UI. The overall rate of response was 80%.
RESULTS: Physicians miss opportunities to identify patients with UI. Despite substantial specialty variation, behavioral treatments and medications for UI, relative to the Agency for Health Care and Policy Research clinical guidelines, are underused. More than 40% of internists and family practitioners routinely recommended absorbent pads. Only 17% of physicians were aware of the clinical guidelines.
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians identified deficiencies in their level of preparation to evaluate and treat UI. Reports of practice patterns also suggest deficiencies.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Cardiovascular Disease in Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease.Journal of Clinical Medicine 2023 November 9
Monitoring Macro- and Microcirculation in the Critically Ill: A Narrative Review.Avicenna Journal of Medicine 2023 July
Urinary tract infections: a review of the current diagnostics landscape.Journal of Medical Microbiology 2023 November
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app