Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Waitlisting and liver transplantation for MetALD in the United States: An analysis of the UNOS national registry.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The new steatotic liver disease (SLD) nomenclature introduced metabolic and alcohol-associated liver disease (MetALD), describing the intersection of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD). Waitlisting and liver transplantation for MetALD are not well-defined. We aimed to develop and validate an algorithm for identifying SLD phenotypes and assess trends in waitlisting and transplant outcomes.

METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry, supplemented with detailed single-center data. We developed five candidate algorithms for SLD classification and calculated their diagnostic performance. Trends in waitlist registrations and transplants were estimated, and competing risk analyses and Cox regression models were conducted to assess waitlist removal and post-transplant outcomes among SLD phenotypes.

RESULTS: The best-performing algorithm demonstrated substantial agreement (weighted kappa, 0.62) for SLD phenotypes, with acceptable sensitivity (73%) for MetALD. Between 2002-2022, waitlist registrations and transplants for MetALD increased 2.9-fold and 3.3-fold. Since 2013, there was a significant increase in the absolute number of waitlist registrations (122 per year; 95% CI, 111-133) and transplants (107 per year; 95% CI, 94-120) for MetALD. Patients with MetALD experienced higher waitlist removal (aSHR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.17), all-cause mortality (aHR, 1.13; 95%, 1.03-1.23), and graft failure (aHR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.21) than those with ALD.

CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated an algorithm for identifying SLD phenotypes in UNOS. MetALD is the third leading etiology among those waitlisted and transplanted, exhibiting worse pre- and post-transplantation outcomes compared to ALD. Identifying and addressing factors determining poor outcomes is crucial in this patient population.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app