Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Sex differences in clinical features, utilization of oral anticoagulant agents, and one-year outcome in Middle Eastern patients with atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVE: Studies have revealed that sex can predict differences in multiple aspects of atrial fibrillation (AF). These differences are underreported in the Middle East. This study aims to describe sex-specific differences in risk factors, symptomatology, management, and outcomes in Middle Eastern patients with AF.

METHODS: The JoFib (Jordan-Atrial-Fibrillation) study is an observational, prospective, multicenter, nationwide registry in AF. Comparisons were made between female and male patients using Pearson chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. Multivariable regression models were constructed to investigate whether the female sex was predictive of any AF-related outcomes (all-cause death, cardiovascular death, ischemic stroke or systemic embolism [IS/SE], major bleeding, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding).

RESULTS: Of 2,020 patients with AF, 54% (n = 1091) were females. Females with AF were older (median age 71 vs. 69, p < 0.001), but had less heart failure (20.9% vs. 27.2%, p = 0.001) and coronary artery disease (7.5% vs. 14.7%, p < 0.001). Females with AF were more symptomatic (74.7% vs. 66.5%, p < 0.001) and frequently received anticoagulant therapy (84.4% vs. 78.9%, p = 0.001). Rhythm control was pursued less frequently in females (23.4% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.04). All studied outcomes occurred with similar frequencies in females and males, and sex was not significantly predictive of any outcome.

CONCLUSION: Females with AF are more symptomatic, yet they are treated less with rhythm control. Despite higher risk, females have similar risk-adjusted all-cause cardiovascular death and stroke rates compared to males. Future studies should explore how treatments and interventions can influence quality of life and cardiovascular outcomes in females with AF.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app