We have located links that may give you full text access.
In vivo lymph node CEST-Dixon MRI in breast cancer patients with metastatic lymph node involvement.
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2023 September 9
PURPOSE: Axillary lymph nodes (LNs) often present a reservoir for metastatic breast cancer, yet metastatic LN involvement cannot be discerned definitively using diagnostic imaging. This study investigated whether in vivo CEST may discriminate LNs with versus without metastatic involvement.
METHODS: 3T MRI was performed in patients with breast cancer before clinically-indicated mastectomy or lumpectomy with LN removal, after which LN metastasic involvement was determined using histological evaluation. Non-contrast anatomical imaging, as well as B0 and B1 field maps, were acquired in sequence with three-point CEST-Dixon (3D turbo-gradient-echo; factor = 25; TR/TE1/ΔTE = 851/1.35/1.1 ms; spatial-resolution = 2.5 × 2.5 × 6 mm; slices = 10; four sinc-gauss pulses with duty-cycle = 0.5, total saturation duration = 701.7 ms; B1 = 1.5 μT; saturation offsets = -5.5 to +5.5 ppm; stepsize = 0.2 ppm; scan duration = 6 min 30 s). The mean z-spectrum from LNs with (n = 20) versus without (n = 22) metastatic involvement were analyzed and a Wilcoxon rank-sum test (significance: p < 0.05) was applied to evaluate differences in B0, B1 , and magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) in differing spectral regions of known proton exchange (nuclear Overhauser effect [NOE], amide, amine, and hydroxyl) between cohorts.
RESULTS: No difference in axillary B1 (p = 0.634) or B0 (p = 0.689) was observed between cohorts. Elevated MTR was observed for the NOE (-1.7 ppm; MTR = 0.285 ± 0.075 vs. 0.248 ± 0.039; p = 0.048), amine (+2.5 ppm; MTR = 0.284 ± 0.067 vs. 0.234 ± 0.31; p = 0.005), and hydroxyl (+1 ppm; MTR = 0.394 ± 0.075 vs. 0.329 ± 0.055; p = 0.002) protons in LNs from participants with versus without metastatic involvement.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings are consistent with a unique metastatic LN microenvironment detectable by CEST-Dixon and suggest that CEST MRI may have potential for mapping LN metastasis non-invasively in vivo.
METHODS: 3T MRI was performed in patients with breast cancer before clinically-indicated mastectomy or lumpectomy with LN removal, after which LN metastasic involvement was determined using histological evaluation. Non-contrast anatomical imaging, as well as B0 and B1 field maps, were acquired in sequence with three-point CEST-Dixon (3D turbo-gradient-echo; factor = 25; TR/TE1/ΔTE = 851/1.35/1.1 ms; spatial-resolution = 2.5 × 2.5 × 6 mm; slices = 10; four sinc-gauss pulses with duty-cycle = 0.5, total saturation duration = 701.7 ms; B1 = 1.5 μT; saturation offsets = -5.5 to +5.5 ppm; stepsize = 0.2 ppm; scan duration = 6 min 30 s). The mean z-spectrum from LNs with (n = 20) versus without (n = 22) metastatic involvement were analyzed and a Wilcoxon rank-sum test (significance: p < 0.05) was applied to evaluate differences in B0, B1 , and magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) in differing spectral regions of known proton exchange (nuclear Overhauser effect [NOE], amide, amine, and hydroxyl) between cohorts.
RESULTS: No difference in axillary B1 (p = 0.634) or B0 (p = 0.689) was observed between cohorts. Elevated MTR was observed for the NOE (-1.7 ppm; MTR = 0.285 ± 0.075 vs. 0.248 ± 0.039; p = 0.048), amine (+2.5 ppm; MTR = 0.284 ± 0.067 vs. 0.234 ± 0.31; p = 0.005), and hydroxyl (+1 ppm; MTR = 0.394 ± 0.075 vs. 0.329 ± 0.055; p = 0.002) protons in LNs from participants with versus without metastatic involvement.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings are consistent with a unique metastatic LN microenvironment detectable by CEST-Dixon and suggest that CEST MRI may have potential for mapping LN metastasis non-invasively in vivo.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Review article: Recent advances in ascites and acute kidney injury management in cirrhosis.Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2024 March 26
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app