Excitatory and Inhibitory Signaling in the Nucleus Accumbens Encode Different Aspects of a Pavlovian Cue in Sign Tracking and Goal Tracking Rats.

When a Pavlovian cue is presented separately from its associated reward, some animals will acquire a sign tracking (ST) response, approach and/or interaction with the cue, while others will acquire a goal tracking response, approach to the site of reward. We have previously shown that cue-evoked excitations in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) encode the vigor of both behaviors; in contrast, reward-related responses diverge over the course of training, possibly reflecting neurochemical differences between sign tracker and goal tracker individuals. However, a substantial subset of neurons in the NAc exhibit inhibitory, rather than excitatory, cue-evoked responses, and the evolution of their signaling during Pavlovian conditioning remains unknown. Using single-neuron recordings in behaving rats, we show that NAc neurons with cue-evoked inhibitions have distinct coding properties from neurons with cue-evoked excitations. Cue-evoked inhibitions become more numerous over the course of training and, like excitations, may encode the vigor of sign tracking and goal tracking behavior. However, the responses of cue-inhibited neurons do not evolve differently between sign tracker and goal tracker individuals. Moreover, cue-evoked inhibitions, unlike excitations, are insensitive to extinction of the cue-reward relationship. Finally, we show that cue-evoked excitations are greatly diminished by reward devaluation, while inhibitory cue responses are virtually unaffected. Overall, these findings converge with existing evidence that cue-excited neurons in NAc, but not cue-inhibited neurons, are profoundly sensitive to the same behavior variations that are often associated with changes in dopamine release. Significance Statement Many neurons in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) are excited by environmental cues that predict reward, while others are inhibited by such cues. Cue-excited neurons closely track animals' behavioral responses, and even encode a specific form of learning used by sign trackers (ST), individuals who tend to approach cues, who are prone to impulsivity and addiction-related behavior. Here, we show that cue-excited and cue-inhibited neurons seem to be involved in learning about cues, but only cue-excited neurons flexibly change their responses when cues no longer signal reward (extinction) or when the reward is no longer desired. These findings imply that different aspects of cue-reward learning are supported by different populations of NAc neurons defined by specific activity patterns.