Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Early Termination versus Standard Regimen Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Intracranial Aneurysm Patients Treated with Pipeline Embolization Device Flex with Shield Technology: Preliminary Experience of 3 United States Centers.

World Neurosurgery 2023 July 27
BACKGROUND: Pipeline Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology (PED-Shield) is a third-generation flow diverter with reduced thromboembolic potential. However, safety profile and Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy (DAPT) recommendations with PED-Shield is not well-established. We aim to assess the safety and complication profile with early termination of DAPT with use of PED-Shield.

METHODS: Databases of 3 high-volume cerebrovascular centers were retrospectively reviewed. We identified patients with unruptured and ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with PED-Shield. Patient demographics, aneurysm characteristics, complications and angiographic outcomes were extracted. All patients that had both early termination of DAPT, defined as <180-days, as well as standard duration were included.

RESULTS: 37 patients, totaling 37 aneurysms, had early termination of DAPT while 24 patients with 24 aneurysms received standard duration (>180-days) of DAPT. There was no difference in pre-procedural DAPT regimens between the groups (P=0.503).Following DAPT termination, one major thromboembolic complication was observed in the early termination group while no major or minor thromboembolic or hemorrhagic complication was noted in the standard duration group. Time of angiographic follow-up was not statistically different (P=0.063) between the early termination (343 days, IQR 114-371) and the standard duration (175 days, IQR 111-224.5) groups. There were no statistically significant differences in complete aneurysm occlusion (p=0.857), residual neck (p=0.582) and aneurysm remnant (p=0.352) rates between the groups on angiography.

CONCLUSIONS: Early termination of DAPT proves safe after PED-Shield treatment of intracranial aneurysms with comparable complete occlusion rates.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app