We have located links that may give you full text access.
Strategy of treating secundum atrial septal defect not referred to percutaneous closure.
Congenital Heart Disease 2019 Februrary 5
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate safety and effectiveness of intraoperative device closure for secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) not referred to percutaneous closure.
DESIGN AND PATIENTS: From April 2010 to December 2018, 231 secundum ASD children (≤14 years) directly recommended to surgical repair were enrolled in this study. These patients were divided into two groups according to the parents' choice based on surgeons' recommendation. Follow-up evaluations were adopted at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the procedure and yearly thereafter. In Group A, 127 patients underwent an initial attempt at device closure. In Group B, 104 patients underwent a repair procedure under cardiopulmonary bypass.
RESULTS: All patients survived. Group A had lower values of operation time, mechanical ventilation time, cardiac intensive care unit duration and amount of blood transfusion. Nevertheless, postoperative hospitalization time between two groups showed no statistical difference. In group A, 109 (85.83%) patients were successfully occluded, whereas 18 (14.17%) patients were converted to open-heart surgery. No severe complications occurred in the follow-up period.
CONCLUSION: Intraoperative device closure is safe, effective procedure for selected cases with secundum ASDs which were not referred to percutaneous closure because of more suitable occluder selection, no "unbutton effect" and stitching enhancement.
DESIGN AND PATIENTS: From April 2010 to December 2018, 231 secundum ASD children (≤14 years) directly recommended to surgical repair were enrolled in this study. These patients were divided into two groups according to the parents' choice based on surgeons' recommendation. Follow-up evaluations were adopted at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the procedure and yearly thereafter. In Group A, 127 patients underwent an initial attempt at device closure. In Group B, 104 patients underwent a repair procedure under cardiopulmonary bypass.
RESULTS: All patients survived. Group A had lower values of operation time, mechanical ventilation time, cardiac intensive care unit duration and amount of blood transfusion. Nevertheless, postoperative hospitalization time between two groups showed no statistical difference. In group A, 109 (85.83%) patients were successfully occluded, whereas 18 (14.17%) patients were converted to open-heart surgery. No severe complications occurred in the follow-up period.
CONCLUSION: Intraoperative device closure is safe, effective procedure for selected cases with secundum ASDs which were not referred to percutaneous closure because of more suitable occluder selection, no "unbutton effect" and stitching enhancement.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Review article: Recent advances in ascites and acute kidney injury management in cirrhosis.Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2024 March 26
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app