We have located links that may give you full text access.
English Abstract
Journal Article
[Prehospital assessment and treatment decisions of a suspected acute coronary syndrome: what are the problems? Results of the "Emergency Doctor and Acute Myocardial Infarction" study (NAAMI)].
Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 2009 October
BACKGROUND: Interpretation of prehospital 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECG) in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains a diagnostic challenge in many cases. The aim of this study was to determine whether board-certified emergency physicians (BCEP) are able to distinguish STEMI from non-STEMI in a large proportion of cases, thus assuring more precise prehospital triage and treatment.
METHODS: Electrocardiograms of eight patients with acute non-traumatic chest pain (with 6 ECGs demonstrating STEMI, one with pericarditis, and one with pulmonary embolism) were assessed in a blinded fashion by 73 BCEP (19 female, mean age 37 +/- 5.3 years). Decisions had to be made by them regarding the diagnosis (STEMI or not) and treatment (immediate reperfusion or transfer to the nearest hospital without facilities for percutaneous coronary intervention).
RESULTS: In the ECGs with STEMI 83% of BCEPs made the correct diagnosis without significant differences between the subgroups. But in cases of non-STEMI-ECG only 30% of BECP made the correct diagnosis. The results in interpreting non-STEMI were better in older (> 50 years) BCEPs and in those with a background in internal medicine (p = 0.045, and p = 0.01, respectively). In case of STEMI 75% of BCEPs initiated the correct therapy, without significant differences between the subgroups. In case of non-STEMI ECG only 33% of BECPs made the correct diagnosis. Also, the therapeutic decisions in case of non-STEMI were better in older (> 50 years) BCEPs and in those with a background in internal medicine (p = 0.04, and p = 0.02 respectively).
CONCLUSION: In cases of acute non-traumatic chest pain the interpretation of the electrocardiogram by prehospital emergency doctors give to unsatisfactory results. The present study suggests, that additional training in ECG interpretation may be a critical component of the education of physicians who care for patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome.
METHODS: Electrocardiograms of eight patients with acute non-traumatic chest pain (with 6 ECGs demonstrating STEMI, one with pericarditis, and one with pulmonary embolism) were assessed in a blinded fashion by 73 BCEP (19 female, mean age 37 +/- 5.3 years). Decisions had to be made by them regarding the diagnosis (STEMI or not) and treatment (immediate reperfusion or transfer to the nearest hospital without facilities for percutaneous coronary intervention).
RESULTS: In the ECGs with STEMI 83% of BCEPs made the correct diagnosis without significant differences between the subgroups. But in cases of non-STEMI-ECG only 30% of BECP made the correct diagnosis. The results in interpreting non-STEMI were better in older (> 50 years) BCEPs and in those with a background in internal medicine (p = 0.045, and p = 0.01, respectively). In case of STEMI 75% of BCEPs initiated the correct therapy, without significant differences between the subgroups. In case of non-STEMI ECG only 33% of BECPs made the correct diagnosis. Also, the therapeutic decisions in case of non-STEMI were better in older (> 50 years) BCEPs and in those with a background in internal medicine (p = 0.04, and p = 0.02 respectively).
CONCLUSION: In cases of acute non-traumatic chest pain the interpretation of the electrocardiogram by prehospital emergency doctors give to unsatisfactory results. The present study suggests, that additional training in ECG interpretation may be a critical component of the education of physicians who care for patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Review article: Recent advances in ascites and acute kidney injury management in cirrhosis.Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2024 March 26
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app