COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Incidental renal cell carcinoma-age and stage characterization and clinical implications: study of 1092 patients (1982-1997).

Urology 2000 July
OBJECTIVES: To compare the epidemiologic, clinical, and pathologic characteristics of incidental and symptomatic renal cell carcinoma in a large series of patients, with emphasis on age distribution and its potential impact in defining groups of patients that may benefit from early detection programs.

METHODS: Records of 1092 patients with renal tumors from 1982 to 1997 were reviewed. Age, clinical presentation, and pathologic stage and grade were analyzed. Special attention was given to the age distribution and its relationship to the incidental or symptomatic diagnosis.

RESULTS: The overall mean age and proportion of patients older than 65 gradually increased (from 57 to 62.6 years and from 24.7% to 48.7%, respectively) from 1982 to 1997. The mean age in the incidental group rose steadily higher than in the symptomatic group. A progressive increase of incidental tumors from 13.0% in 1982 to 1983 to 59.2% in 1996 to 1997 was observed. A lower stage (74.3% versus 49.1%), grade (75.5% versus 56.9%), and percentage of metastases at presentation (10.4% versus 19.6%) were registered in the incidentally found neoplasms than in the symptomatic neoplasms. Eighty-two (80.4%) of 102 patients who underwent conservative surgery had incidental renal cell carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm a rapid and dramatic change in the epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of renal cancer, with an increasing number of incidentally found tumors presenting with lower stage, grade, and percentage of metastases. An unexpected but significantly higher rate of renal neoplasms was observed in older patients. The stage, grade, and patient age observed in our series of incidentally found tumors raises the question of whether to leave the current diagnostic approach unaltered, thus benefiting a subgroup of patients with clinically unrecognized and possibly indolent renal cell carcinoma, or to extend early detection programs to younger patients with potentially more aggressive tumors.

Full text links

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Group 7SearchHeart failure treatmentPapersTopicsCollectionsEffects of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Patients With Heart Failure Importance: Only 1 class of glucose-lowering agents-sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors-has been reported to decrease the risk of cardiovascular events primarily by reducingSeptember 1, 2017: JAMA CardiologyAssociations of albuminuria in patients with chronic heart failure: findings in the ALiskiren Observation of heart Failure Treatment study.CONCLUSIONS: Increased UACR is common in patients with heart failure, including non-diabetics. Urinary albumin creatininineJul, 2011: European Journal of Heart FailureRandomized Controlled TrialEffects of Liraglutide on Clinical Stability Among Patients With Advanced Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Review

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app