Effect of formaldehyde/bleach reprocessing on in vivo performances of high-efficiency cellulose and high-flux polysulfone dialyzers.

Among the several disadvantages of reprocessed dialyzers is the concern that reuse could decrease the clearance of uremic toxins, leading to a decrease in the delivered dose of dialysis. To examine this possibility in the clinical setting, the clearances of small molecular weight solutes (urea and creatinine) and middle molecular weight substances (beta 2 microglobulin) were compared during dialysis with "high-efficiency" cellulose (T220L) and "high-flux" polysulfone (F80B) dialyzers reprocessed with formaldehyde and bleach. In a crossover study, six chronic hemodialysis patients were alternately assigned to undergo 21 dialysis treatments with a single T220L dialyzer or F80B dialyzer. Each patient was studied during first use (0 reuse), 2nd reuse (3rd use), and 5th, 10th, 15th, and 20th reuse of each dialyzer. Urea, creatinine, and beta 2 microglobulin clearances were measured at blood flow rates of 300 ml/min (Qb 300) and 400 ml/min (Qb 400). Total albumin loss into the dialysate was measured during each treatment. Urea or creatinine clearance of new T220L dialyzers was not significantly different from that of new F80B dialyzers at either Qb. Urea clearance of F80B dialyzers at Qb 300 decreased from 241 +/- 2 ml/min for new dialyzers to 221 +/- 5 ml/min after 20 reuses (P < 0.001), and Qb 400 from 280 +/- 4 ml/min for new dialyzers to 253 +/- 7 ml/min after 20 reuses (P = 0.001). Similarly, with reuse, creatinine clearance of F80B dialyzers also decreased at Qb 300 (P = 0.07) and Qb 400 (P = 0.03). In contrast, urea or creatinine clearance of T220L dialyzers did not decrease with reuse at either Qb. Urea clearance of T220L dialyzers was significantly higher than that of F80B at Qb 300 at the 5th, 10th, 15th, and 20th reuse (P < 0.001, = 0.005, = 0.004, and = 0.006, respectively), and Qb 400 at the 2nd, 5th, 10th, 15th, and 20th reuse (P = 0.04, 0.008, 0.03, 0.02, and 0.008, respectively). Beta 2 microglobulin clearance of T220L dialyzers was < 5.0 ml/min across the reuses studied. Beta 2 microglobulin clearance of F80B was < 5.0 ml/min for new dialyzers, but increased to 21.2 +/- 5.3 ml/min (Qb 300) and 23.6 +/- 3.3 ml/min (Qb 400) after 20 reuses (P < 0.001). Throughout the study, albumin was undetectable in the dialysate with T220L dialyzers. With F80B dialyzers, albumin was detected in the dialysate in four instances (total loss during dialysis, 483 mg to 1.467 g). In summary, the results of this study emphasize the greater need for information on dialyzer clearances during clinical dialysis, especially with reprocessed dialyzers. A more accurate knowledge of dialyzer performance in vivo would help to ensure that the dose of dialysis prescribed is indeed delivered to the patients.