Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

No safe time window in malrotation and volvulus: A consecutive cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Malrotation and volvulus classically present with bilious vomiting. It is more common earlier in life, but there are other causes of bile-stained vomiting. This leads some clinicians to 'watch and wait'. In the presence of a volvulus, this is potentially a fatal decision. It is not clear from the literature if there is a safe time window in which children can be observed in the hope of avoiding transfers or radiological investigations.

AIM: To determine whether time to identification and management of midgut volvulus correlated with morbidity and mortality; and whether there were patterns to transition of care.

METHODS: Multicentre, retrospective review of all children with malrotation ± volvulus at two tertiary children's hospitals in Brisbane from 2000 to 2012. Data collected included age at presentation, timing between symptom onset and presentation, radiological findings, and definitive surgical management. Outcomes included patient length of stay (LOS), total parenteral nutrition (TPN) duration, re-operations and death.

RESULTS: There were 96 cases of malrotation identified, with 23 excluded (elective operation, insufficient data). Neonates made up 66% of included cases. Only 14% of cases were over 12 months old. Bilious vomiting or bile-stained aspirates were the presenting symptoms in 71% (52). Overall mortality was 5.56%. Time from symptom onset to presentation or management was not significantly associated with morbidity or mortality. More than half (53%, 39/73) of patients received total parenteral nutrition; 20/39 for more than 10 days. Neonates and infants had a significantly higher rate of TPN compared with older children (P < 0.001). Those requiring TPN post-operatively had a significantly higher mortality compared with those who did not (P = 0.02). Time from symptom onset to presentation or definitive management was not significantly associated with LOS, TPN duration, or need for re-operation.

CONCLUSION: Malrotation remains a time-critical diagnosis to secure and treat. Even a short duration of symptoms can be associated with high morbidity or mortality. There is no place for 'watch and wait' for such patients, and malrotation/volvulus should be emergently actively excluded with contrast studies.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app