We have located links that may give you full text access.
Determining the clinicopathological significance of the VI-RADS ≧4 group: a retrospective study.
BMC Urology 2024 March 21
BACKGROUND: The Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) is widely used for predicting muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). This study aimed to determine the clinicopathological significance of the VI-RADS ≧4 (VI≧4) group.
METHODS: Patients who underwent transurethral resections of bladder tumors during the study period and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging were considered. The patients were pathologically diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma (UC). We first compared the results of patients with VI-RADS scores of 3 and 4 to determine the cut-off score for MIBC; thereafter, the patients were divided into the VI≧4 and VI-RADS ≦3 (VI≦3) groups using VI-RADS. The clinicopathological significance of the VI≧4 group was examined retrospectively by comparing the characteristics of each group.
RESULTS: In total, 121 cases were examined, of which 28 were pathologically diagnosed with MIBC. Of the 28 MIBC cases, three (10.7%) had a VI-RADS score of ≦3, and 25 (89.3%) had a VI-RADS score of ≧4. Of the 93 NMIBC cases, 86 (92.5%) had a VI-RADS score of ≦3, and seven (7.5%) had a VI-RADS score of ≧4. The diagnostic performance of the VI-RADS with a cut-off score of 4 was 89.3% for sensitivity, 92.5% for specificity, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.91. Contrastingly, for a cut-off score of 3, the sensitivity was 89.3%, specificity was 62.0%, and AUC was 0.72. A VI-RADS score of ≥ 4 could predict MIBC. In the VI≧4 group, 30 of 32 (93.8%) patients had high-grade tumors. The VI≧4 group had significantly more high-grade bladder cancers than the VI≦3 group (p < 0.001 OR = 31.77 95%CI:8.47-1119.07). In addition, the VI≧4 group had more tumor necrosis (VI≧4 vs VI≦3, p < 0.001 OR = 7.46 95%CI:2.61-21.34) and more UC variant cases (VI≧4 vs VI≦3, p = 0.034 OR = 3.28 95%CI:1.05-10.25) than the VI≦3 group.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that VI-RADS has a high diagnostic performance in predicting MIBC and that VI-RADS could diagnose high-grade tumors, necrosis, and UC variants.
METHODS: Patients who underwent transurethral resections of bladder tumors during the study period and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging were considered. The patients were pathologically diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma (UC). We first compared the results of patients with VI-RADS scores of 3 and 4 to determine the cut-off score for MIBC; thereafter, the patients were divided into the VI≧4 and VI-RADS ≦3 (VI≦3) groups using VI-RADS. The clinicopathological significance of the VI≧4 group was examined retrospectively by comparing the characteristics of each group.
RESULTS: In total, 121 cases were examined, of which 28 were pathologically diagnosed with MIBC. Of the 28 MIBC cases, three (10.7%) had a VI-RADS score of ≦3, and 25 (89.3%) had a VI-RADS score of ≧4. Of the 93 NMIBC cases, 86 (92.5%) had a VI-RADS score of ≦3, and seven (7.5%) had a VI-RADS score of ≧4. The diagnostic performance of the VI-RADS with a cut-off score of 4 was 89.3% for sensitivity, 92.5% for specificity, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.91. Contrastingly, for a cut-off score of 3, the sensitivity was 89.3%, specificity was 62.0%, and AUC was 0.72. A VI-RADS score of ≥ 4 could predict MIBC. In the VI≧4 group, 30 of 32 (93.8%) patients had high-grade tumors. The VI≧4 group had significantly more high-grade bladder cancers than the VI≦3 group (p < 0.001 OR = 31.77 95%CI:8.47-1119.07). In addition, the VI≧4 group had more tumor necrosis (VI≧4 vs VI≦3, p < 0.001 OR = 7.46 95%CI:2.61-21.34) and more UC variant cases (VI≧4 vs VI≦3, p = 0.034 OR = 3.28 95%CI:1.05-10.25) than the VI≦3 group.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that VI-RADS has a high diagnostic performance in predicting MIBC and that VI-RADS could diagnose high-grade tumors, necrosis, and UC variants.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app