Transformation mechanisms of the antidepressant citalopram in a moving bed biofilm reactor: Substrate-depended pathways, eco-toxicities and enantiomeric profiles.

Citalopram (CIT) is one of the most consumed antidepressants and frequently detected in aquatic environments worldwide. Conventional wastewater treatment cannot remove this neuronal active pharmaceutical efficiently. Past studies showed that moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBRs) can degrade CIT but the exact transformation pathways and toxicity reduction remained unclear. In this study, the effects of substrate stimulation on CIT transformation in an MBBR were systematically investigated. The results showed that a co-metabolic stimulation by acetate increased the transformation rate by 54 % and 24 % at high (300 μg/L) and environmental concentration (1.8 μg/L) of CIT, respectively. Conversely, the complex substrates in raw wastewater reduced the reaction rates by 44 %, suggesting a competitive inhibition on the enzymatic sites. The substrate stimulation changed the enantiomeric fraction (EF) of CIT from racemic (EF=0.5) to 0.60 at the high CIT concentrations, while those at lower concentrations resulted in an EF of 0.33, indicating that probably different enantioselective enzymes degraded CIT at high concentrations than at low concentrations, i.e., the presence of 300 µg/L CIT was possibly sufficient to induce the synthesis of different enantioselective enzymes, than those originally present. Through non-target and target analysis, in total 19 transformation products (TPs) including 7 TPs that were hitherto not mentioned in the literature were identified. Among these were quaternary amines, alkenes and conjugate TPs. The major transformation pathways were a) nitrile hydrolysis (up to 43 %), b) amide hydrolysis, and c) N-oxidation. Dosing acetate up-regulated significantly the amide hydrolysis, N-oxidation and conjugation pathways but inhibited the N-demethylation and α-carbon hydroxylation pathways. The in-silico toxicity assessment of CIT and its TPs suggested the overall eco-toxic potential of TPs was reduced by MBBR. Furthermore, the degradation under carbon-limited (famine) conditions favored the formation of the more toxic carboxamide, N-desmethyl and alkene TPs, while carbon-rich conditions, promoted the production of the less toxic carboxylic acid, N-oxide and ester TPs. Therefore, this study demonstrated that a) the co-metabolic stimulation of CIT metabolization by dosing a simple carbon source or b) inhibition of CIT metabolization by complex substrates; c) substrate stimulation made a difference on CIT transformation rates, enantiomeric profiles, pathways and toxic potentials. Overall, a simple-carbon co-metabolic stimulated MBBR was an efficient up-regulation strategy to minimize hazardous CIT and CIT-TPs as much as possible.