Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Effect of in situ vermicomposting combined with biochar application on soil properties and crop yields in the tomato monoculture system.

Vermicompost and biochar have been widely used to improve soil conditions. However, little information is available regarding the efficiency and effectiveness of in situ vermicomposting with biochar (IVB) in monoculture soils. In this study, we estimated the effects of IVB on soil physiochemical and microbial properties, crop yields, and fruit quality under the tomato monoculture system. The soil treatments considered were (i) untreated monoculture soil (MS, control), (ii) MS plus 1.5 t/ha biochar applied to soil surface (MS+1.5BCS), (iii) MS plus 3 t/ha biochar applied to soil surface (MS+3BCS), (iv) MS mixed with 1.5 t/ha biochar (MS+1.5BCM), (v) MS mixed with 3 t/ha biochar (MS+3BCM), (vi) in situ vermicomposting (VC), (vii) VC plus 1.5 t/ha biochar applied to VC surface (VC+1.5BCS), (viii) VC plus 3 t/ha biochar applied to VC surface (VC+3BCS), (ix) VC mixed with 1.5 t/ha biochar (VC+1.5BCM), and (x) VC mixed with 3 t/ha biochar (VC+3BCM). In general, soil pH varied from 7.68 to 7.96 under VC-related treatments. The microbial diversity was much higher in bacterial communities (OTU: 2284-3194, Shannon index: 8.81-9.91) than in fungal communities (OTU: 392-782, Shannon index: 4.63-5.71) in VC-related treatments. Specifically, Proteobacteria was the dominant bacterial phylum, followed by Bacteroidota, Chloroflexi, Patescibacteria, Acidobacteriota, Firmicutes, and Myxococcota. It is worth noting that IVB-related treatments could increase the relative abundance of Acidobacteria and reduced the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes. In addition, the VC+1.5BCM treatment exhibited the greatest yield (9377.6 kg/667m2 ) and simultaneously showed higher fruit quality (vitamin C, 28.94 mg/100g; soluble sugar, 20.15%) as compared to other treatments. Our results suggested that in situ vermicomposting with biochar can improve soil properties and enhance both crop yields and fruit quality under the tomato monoculture system.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app