Value of Hand-held Optical Illuminated Magnifiers for Sustained Silent Reading by Visually-Impaired Adults.

SIGNIFICANCE: Vision rehabilitation providers tend to recommend hand-held, illuminated optical magnifiers for short duration, spot reading tasks, but this study indicates they are also a viable option to improve sustained, continuous text reading (e.g., books or magazines), especially for visually impaired adults who read slowly with only spectacle-based near correction.

PURPOSE: The utility of hand-held optical magnifiers for sustained silent reading tasks involving normal-sized, continuous text could be a valuable indication that is not recognized by vision rehabilitation providers and patients.

METHODS: Hand-held, illuminated optical magnifiers were dispensed to 29 visually impaired adults who completed the sustained silent reading test by phone at baseline without the new magnifier and 1-month after using the magnifier. Reading speed in words per minute (wpm) was calculated from the time to read each page, then averaged across up to ten pages or determined for the fastest read page (maximum).

RESULTS: From baseline without the magnifier to 1-month with the magnifier, there was a significant improvement in mean reading speed by 14 wpm (95%CI:2.6-24; P = .017) and for maximum reading speed by 18 wpm (95%CI:5.4-30; P = .005) on average across participants. Participants who had slower baseline reading speeds without the magnifier demonstrated significantly greater improvements in mean and maximum reading speeds on average with the magnifier (95%CI:8-32; P = .003)(95%CI:4-36; P = .015). A significantly greater number of pages were read with the new magnifier than without it (Wilcoxon z = -2.5; P = .013). A significantly greater number of pages were read with the magnifier by participants who read fewer pages at baseline (95%CI:0.57-5.6; P = .018) or had greater improvements in mean reading speed (95%CI:0.57-5.6; P = .007).

CONCLUSIONS: Many visually impaired adults read more quickly and/or read a greater number of pages after using a new magnifier for a month than compared to without it. The largest gains occurred among those with more difficulty at baseline, indicating the potential to improve reading rates with magnifiers for those with greater deficits.