Flexor hallucis brevis motor unit behavior in response to moderate increases in rate of force development.

BACKGROUND: Studies on motor unit behaviour with varying rates of force development have focussed predominantly on comparisons between slow and ballistic ( i.e. , very fast) contractions. It remains unclear how motor units respond to less extreme changes in rates of force development. Here, we studied a small intrinsic foot muscle, flexor hallucis brevis (FHB) where the aim was to compare motor unit discharge rates and recruitment thresholds at two rates of force development. We specifically chose to investigate relatively slow to moderate rates of force development, not ballistic, as the chosen rates are more akin to those that presumably occur during daily activity.

METHODS: We decomposed electromyographic signals to identify motor unit action potentials obtained from indwelling fine-wire electrodes in FHB, from ten male participants. Participants performed isometric ramp-and-hold contractions from relaxed to 50% of a maximal voluntary contraction. This was done for two rates of force development; one with the ramp performed over 5 s (slow condition) and one over 2.5 s (fast condition). Recruitment thresholds and discharge rates were calculated over the ascending limb of the ramp and compared between the two ramp conditions for matched motor units. A repeated measures nested linear mixed model was used to compare these parameters statistically. A linear repeated measures correlation was used to assess any relationship between changes in recruitment threshold and mean discharge rate between the two conditions.

RESULTS: A significant increase in the initial discharge rate ( i.e. , at recruitment) in the fast (mean: 8.6 ±  2.4 Hz) compared to the slow (mean: 7.8 ± 2.3 Hz) condition ( P = 0.027), with no changes in recruitment threshold ( P = 0.588), mean discharge rate ( P = 0.549) or final discharge rate ( P = 0.763) was observed. However, we found substantial variability in motor unit responses within and between conditions. A small but significant negative correlation (R2 = 0.33, P = 0.003) was found between the difference in recruitment threshold and the difference in mean discharge rate between the two conditions.

CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that as force increases for contractions with slower force development, increasing the initial discharge rate of recruited motor units produces the increase in rate of force development, without a change in their recruitment thresholds, mean or final discharge rate. However, an important finding was that for only moderate changes in rate of force development, as studied here, not all units respond similarly. This is different from what has been described in the literature for ballistic contractions in other muscle groups, where all motor units respond similarly to the increase in neural drive. Changing the discharge behaviour of a small group of motor units may be sufficient in developing force at the required rate rather than having the discharge behaviour of the entire motor unit pool change equally.