We have located links that may give you full text access.
Risk factors and management of biliary stones after living donor liver transplant and its effect on graft outcome.
Background: Bile stones are associated with numerous complications in liver transplant recipients. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been proven to be safe and highly effective in dealing with most post-transplant biliary complications.
Objective: The objective of this study was to identify the possible risk factors for bile stone formation on top of biliary stricture, the effects of stones on graft outcomes, and their management.
Methods: This case-control study included 83 patients who underwent living donor liver transplant (LDLT) and suffered from postoperative biliary stricture with or without stones. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 ( n = 55) included patients with biliary strictures with no stones and group 2 ( n = 28) included patients who developed stones on top of biliary strictures. Data about the recipient and donor characteristics, surgical technique, blood lipid profile, immunosuppressive drugs, post-transplant complications, and interventions were collected from the medical records.
Results: The frequency of hepatitis C virus (HCV) was significantly higher in group 2 compared to group 1 (71.4% vs. 47.3%, p = 0.036). The body mass index (BMI) of the donors was significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 (25.17 ± 2.53 vs. 23.68 ± 2.63, p = 0.015). Episodes of acute rejection were significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 (21.4% vs. 5.5%, p = 0.027). The ERCP was sufficient in most of the cases (89.2%) to ensure biliary drainage. The identified independent risk factors for biliary stones included HCV, biliary drain, donor's BMI, and serum cholesterol level.
Conclusion: Positive HCV, biliary drain insertion, donor's BMI, and serum cholesterol level were independent risk factors for developing bile stones on top of biliary strictures. Biliary stones were associated with high episodes of acute graft rejection, and they could be successfully managed by the ERCP modality.
Objective: The objective of this study was to identify the possible risk factors for bile stone formation on top of biliary stricture, the effects of stones on graft outcomes, and their management.
Methods: This case-control study included 83 patients who underwent living donor liver transplant (LDLT) and suffered from postoperative biliary stricture with or without stones. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 ( n = 55) included patients with biliary strictures with no stones and group 2 ( n = 28) included patients who developed stones on top of biliary strictures. Data about the recipient and donor characteristics, surgical technique, blood lipid profile, immunosuppressive drugs, post-transplant complications, and interventions were collected from the medical records.
Results: The frequency of hepatitis C virus (HCV) was significantly higher in group 2 compared to group 1 (71.4% vs. 47.3%, p = 0.036). The body mass index (BMI) of the donors was significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 (25.17 ± 2.53 vs. 23.68 ± 2.63, p = 0.015). Episodes of acute rejection were significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 (21.4% vs. 5.5%, p = 0.027). The ERCP was sufficient in most of the cases (89.2%) to ensure biliary drainage. The identified independent risk factors for biliary stones included HCV, biliary drain, donor's BMI, and serum cholesterol level.
Conclusion: Positive HCV, biliary drain insertion, donor's BMI, and serum cholesterol level were independent risk factors for developing bile stones on top of biliary strictures. Biliary stones were associated with high episodes of acute graft rejection, and they could be successfully managed by the ERCP modality.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app