Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Effects of Longitudinal Bending Stiffness of forefoot rocker profile shoes on ankle kinematics and kinetics.

Gait & Posture 2021 September 21
INTRODUCTION: Rocker profile shoes with a proximally placed apex are currently one of the most prescribed shoe modifications for treatment and prevention of lower leg deficits. Three geometrical rocker design parameters apex position (AP), apex angle (AA) and rocker radius (RR) influence both plantar pressure redistribution and kinetic and kinematic alterations of the lower leg. In addition, longitudinal bending stiffness (LBS) of the outsole influences these parameters as well. This study aims to investigate the effects of the LBS in combination with different forefoot radii of rocker shoes on kinematics and kinetics of the lower limb.

METHODS: 10 participants walked in standard shoes and six experimental shoe conditions with high and low LBS and three different forefoot rocker radii with the same (proximal) AP and AA. Lower extremity kinematics and kinetics were collected while walking on an instrumented treadmill at preferred walking speed and analysed with a repeated measures ANOVA and Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) (α = .05; post hoc α = .05/6).

RESULTS: SPM analyses revealed no significant differences for LBS and interaction LBS*RR for most research variables in terminal stance (ankle angle, ankle moment, ankle power, foot-to-horizontal angle, shank-to-vertical angle, external ankle moment, ground reaction force angle). A significant LBS effect was found for anterior-posterior position of the centre of pressure during pre-swing and peak ankle dorsiflexion angle. No relevant significant differences were found in spatio-temporal parameters and total work at the ankle between low and high LBS.

CONCLUSION: This study showed that longitudinal bending stiffness does not affect the biomechanical working mechanism of rocker profile shoes as long as toe plantarflexion is restricted. Providing that the forefoot rocker radius supports at least a normal foot-to-horizontal angle at toe-off, there is no reason to increase sole stiffness to change ankle kinematics and kinetics.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app