We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparing symptom ratings by staff and family carers in residents dying in long-term care facilities in three European countries, results from a PACE-survey.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 2020 March 11
CONTEXT: Symptom management is essential in the end of life care of long-term care facility residents.
OBJECTIVES: To study discrepancies and possible associated factors in staff and family carers' symptom assessment scores for residents in the last week of life.
METHODS: A post mortem survey in Belgium, the Netherlands and Finland: staff and family carers completed the "End-Of-Life in Dementia - Comfort Assessment in Dying" scale (EOLD-CAD), rating 14 symptoms on a 1 to 3-point scale. Higher scores reflect better comfort. We calculated mean paired differences in symptom, subscale and total scores at a group level and interrater agreement and percentage of perfect agreement at a resident level.
RESULTS: Mean staff scores significantly reflected better comfort than those of family carers for the total EOLD-CAD (31.61 versus 29.81; P-value < 0.001) and for the physical distress ( 8.64 vs 7.62; P-value < 0.001) and dying symptoms (8.95 vs 8.25; P-value < 0.001) subscales. No significant differences were found for emotional distress and well-being The largest discrepancies were found for "gurgling", "discomfort", "restlessness" and "choking" for which staff answered "not at all" whereas the family carer answered "a lot", in respectively 9.5, 7.3, 6.7 and 6.1% of cases. Interrater agreement κ ranged from 0.106 to 0.204, the extent of perfect agreement from 40.8 for lack of serenity to 68.7 % for crying.
CONCLUSION: There is a need for improved communication between staff andfamily and discussion about symptom burden in the dying phase in long-term care facilities.
OBJECTIVES: To study discrepancies and possible associated factors in staff and family carers' symptom assessment scores for residents in the last week of life.
METHODS: A post mortem survey in Belgium, the Netherlands and Finland: staff and family carers completed the "End-Of-Life in Dementia - Comfort Assessment in Dying" scale (EOLD-CAD), rating 14 symptoms on a 1 to 3-point scale. Higher scores reflect better comfort. We calculated mean paired differences in symptom, subscale and total scores at a group level and interrater agreement and percentage of perfect agreement at a resident level.
RESULTS: Mean staff scores significantly reflected better comfort than those of family carers for the total EOLD-CAD (31.61 versus 29.81; P-value < 0.001) and for the physical distress ( 8.64 vs 7.62; P-value < 0.001) and dying symptoms (8.95 vs 8.25; P-value < 0.001) subscales. No significant differences were found for emotional distress and well-being The largest discrepancies were found for "gurgling", "discomfort", "restlessness" and "choking" for which staff answered "not at all" whereas the family carer answered "a lot", in respectively 9.5, 7.3, 6.7 and 6.1% of cases. Interrater agreement κ ranged from 0.106 to 0.204, the extent of perfect agreement from 40.8 for lack of serenity to 68.7 % for crying.
CONCLUSION: There is a need for improved communication between staff andfamily and discussion about symptom burden in the dying phase in long-term care facilities.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app