Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Clinical epidemiology of familial sarcoidosis: A systematic literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Although the presence of familial sarcoidosis has been confirmed, clinical and epidemiological data on its characteristics are scattered and sometimes paradoxical. The objective of this review is to assess what is known on the clinical epidemiology of familial sarcoidosis, by combining data from early case reports with recent population based data; aiming to support in clinical decision making and providing information to patients.

METHOD: A systematic review of the literature in PubMed was done and 27 studies with clinical or epidemiological data on familial sarcoidosis, published between 1947 and 2017, were included.

RESULTS: The pooled prevalence proportion of familial sarcoidosis, based on twelve study populations, was 9.5% (CI 4.6-16.1), highest in French, African American, Dutch and Irish patients. A heritability of 60-70% was estimated in diverse studies. Relative types and relationships most often reported in familial sarcoidosis were siblings and mother-child relationships. Familial risk is heterogeneous. In African Americans specific environmental factors have been associated with familial sarcoidosis (OR between 1.5 and 3.2). European American and African American subjects had different relative risks for first degree familial relationships (OR of 16.6 vs 3.1) and relative risk differed between relative types. Clinical findings in familial sarcoidosis are still obscure.

CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of familial sarcoidosis is high in specific study populations from countries worldwide. The estimated heritability of 60-70%, suggests a shared determinant, and the heterogeneous familial risk, associated with both genetic and environmental factors. Familial relative risks and clinical phenotypes may differ between ethnic groups and relative types, but require further study.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app