Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Blood pressure response to medical treatment in the emergency department - a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: It is unclear whether blood pressure (BP) without target organ damage should be decreased in patients in the emergency department (ED). It is also uncertain whether any certain class of medications has an advantage over the other in this setting. This study addressed both these questions.

METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, all patients attending a tertiary care ED with elevated BP were evaluated. All patients with target organ damage as well as those with significant active co-morbidities, such as myocardial ischemia, were excluded. Baseline characteristics and response of BP to therapy were compared between those treated and untreated in the ED. In addition, BP response to therapy was compared between different classes of antihypertensive medications.

RESULTS: Overall, 438 patients were included in the final analysis (62% female), of which 275 (63%) were treated in the ED. Antihypertensive medications were more commonly prescribed in the ED for those with higher systolic and diastolic BP, but other baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Only systolic BP significantly decreased in those treated with antihypertensive medications compared with those untreated. The most commonly used classes were angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs). Use of either of these drug classes was not associated with a significant decrease in either systolic or diastolic BP compared with the use of other drug classes.

CONCLUSIONS: Antihypertensive drug therapy is more commonly prescribed in the ED in individuals with both elevated systolic and diastolic BP, but leads to a significant decrease only in systolic BP. Use of either ACEis or CCBs is not associated with a significant decrease in either systolic or diastolic BP compared with other drug classes.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app