We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
The CLOCK trial, a double-blinded randomized controlled trial: Trisodium citrate 30% and minocycline 3 mg/mL plus EDTA 30 mg/mL are effective and safe for catheter patency maintenance among CKD 5D patients on hemodialysis.
Hemodialysis International 2017 April
INTRODUCTION: Poor blood flow rate (PF) is highly prevalent among CKD 5D patients with long-term central venous catheters. Heparin catheter lock solutions are commonly used to maintain catheter patency, however the incidence of PF remains high. The purpose of the CLOCK Trial was to evaluate two catheter lock solutions on reduction of PF incidence.
METHODS: Seventy-five CKD 5D patients on high-efficiency hemodialysis at the Integrated Centre of Nephrology (Guarulhos, Brazil) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive a lock solution combining minocycline 3 mg/mL with the anticoagulant/chelation agent EDTA 30 mg/mL (M-EDTA) or heparin 1000 IU/mL (H) or trisodium citrate 30% (TSC) vs. Hfor 15 weeks. A total of 68 patients completed the trial in which both investigators and patients were blinded to treatment allocation. The primary end-point was the occurrence of hydraulic resistance and secondary safety end-point was adverse drug reactions related to the lock solutions.
FINDINGS: At the beginning of the trial, 7 patients were excluded from this trial due to their poor catheter care. The incidence of hydraulic resistance was significantly higher among patients on H (18/23) compared to TSC (4/22) and M-EDTA (2/23) lock solutions, (P < 0.001).
DISCUSSION: The CLOCK Trial suggests TSC and M-EDTA may preserve catheter patency better than H. TSC may be a better option due the lack of association with long-term antimicrobial resistance.
METHODS: Seventy-five CKD 5D patients on high-efficiency hemodialysis at the Integrated Centre of Nephrology (Guarulhos, Brazil) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive a lock solution combining minocycline 3 mg/mL with the anticoagulant/chelation agent EDTA 30 mg/mL (M-EDTA) or heparin 1000 IU/mL (H) or trisodium citrate 30% (TSC) vs. Hfor 15 weeks. A total of 68 patients completed the trial in which both investigators and patients were blinded to treatment allocation. The primary end-point was the occurrence of hydraulic resistance and secondary safety end-point was adverse drug reactions related to the lock solutions.
FINDINGS: At the beginning of the trial, 7 patients were excluded from this trial due to their poor catheter care. The incidence of hydraulic resistance was significantly higher among patients on H (18/23) compared to TSC (4/22) and M-EDTA (2/23) lock solutions, (P < 0.001).
DISCUSSION: The CLOCK Trial suggests TSC and M-EDTA may preserve catheter patency better than H. TSC may be a better option due the lack of association with long-term antimicrobial resistance.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app