Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Elevation of the maxillary sinus membrane for de-novo bone formation: First results of a prospective study in humans.

PURPOSE: Sinus floor elevation via the lateral window approach represents a reliable technique for bone augmentation in the atrophic posterior maxilla. It is known that sinus membrane elevation leads to new bone formation. This prospective clinical study compared a specific technique in sinus membrane elevation with a conventional sinus floor augmentation (xenogenous/autogenous bone) in a human split mouth model.

METHODS: Five edentulous patients with highly atrophic posterior maxillae were included in this study. On one maxillary side a degradable PDLLA-membrane was placed to create a space underneath the sinus membrane. Contralateral a mixture of autogenous and xenogenous bone was used for sinus floor augmentation. A two-stage procedure was carried out. The following variables were assessed: bone regeneration on cone-beam computed tomography (cone-beam CT), implant success, prosthetic comfort and patient satisfaction. Bone biopsies were taken with simultaneous implant placement. The samples were histologically analyzed.

RESULTS: Cone-beam CTs revealed new bone formation on both sides. Thirty implants were placed, 15 in the augmented region and 15 in the non-augmented side. Thirty bone biopsies were taken and evaluated. Vital new bone was detected on the experimental side (osteoinductivity). On the conventional side a mixture of autogenous and residual bone substitute material was seen (osteoconductivity). Implant survival was 100% so far. Patient's satisfaction was high and prosthetic complications were not encountered.

CONCLUSION: As it provides the highest rate of bone formation, autogenous bone in combination with bone substitute material can be considered as a very reliable standard procedure in sinus floor augmentation. The specific sinus membrane elevation technique as presented here showed satisfying results and might be a suitable alternative for maxillary sinus augmentation.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app