Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Diagnostic Performance of (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (131)I-MIBG Scintigraphy in Mapping Metastatic Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of (68)Ga-DOTATATE (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT), (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (131)I-MIBG scintigraphy in the mapping of metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen patients (male = 8, female = 9; age range, 13-68 years) with clinically proven or suspicious metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma were included in this prospective study. Twelve patients underwent all three modalities, whereas five patients underwent (68)Ga-DOTATATE and (131)I-MIBG without (18)F-FDG. A composite reference standard derived from anatomical and functional imaging findings, along with histopathological information, was used to validate the findings. Results were analysed on a per-patient and on per-lesion basis. Sensitivity and accuracy were assessed using McNemar's test.

RESULTS: On a per-patient basis, 14/17 patients were detected in (68)Ga-DOTATATE, 7/17 patients in (131)I-MIBG, and 10/12 patients in (18)F-FDG. The sensitivity and accuracy of (68)Ga-DOTATATE, (131)I-MIBG and (18)F-FDG were (93.3 %, 94.1 %), (46.7 %, 52.9 %) and (90.9 %, 91.7 %) respectively. On a per-lesion basis, an overall of 472 positive lesions were detected; of which 432/472 were identified by (68)Ga-DOTATATE, 74/472 by (131)I-MIBG, and 154/300 (patient, n = 12) by (18)F-FDG. The sensitivity and accuracy of (68)Ga-DOTATATE, (131)I-MIBG and (18)F-FDG were (91.5 %, 92.6 % p < 0.0001), (15.7 %, 26.0 % p < 0.0001) and (51.3 %, 57.8 % p < 0.0001) respectively. Discordant lesions were demonstrated on (68)Ga-DOTATATE, (131)I-MIBG and (18)F-FDG.

CONCLUSIONS: Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT shows high diagnostic accuracy than (131)I-MIBG scintigraphy and (18)F-FDG PET/ CT in mapping metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app