We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Biomechanical study of unilateral pedicle screw combined with contralateral translaminar facet screw in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Clinical Biomechanics 2015 August
BACKGROUND: The biomechanical stability of unilateral pedicle screw (UPS) combined with contralateral translaminar facet screw (TLFS), especially long-term stability, still needs to be compared to traditional UPS or bilateral pedicle screws (BPSs) in details.
METHODS: Twenty-four porcine spines (L2-L5) were tested for flexibility with pure moments of 5Nm under intact status and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion status using UPS+TLFS, UPS or BPS at L3-L4. After short-term (3cycles) and long-term cyclic loading (18,000cycles), the range of motion was obtained and analyzed for single-level constructs in flexion/extension, lateral bending and axial rotation modes. In addition, the relative displacement of contralateral articular processes was recorded in a real time fashion.
FINDINGS: The range of motion was significantly reduced in all instrumented constructs. In all movement directions, UPS+TLFS achieved similar range of motion to BPS after short and long-term loading, which were significantly lower than that in UPS. A significantly larger displacement of contralateral articular process was recorded in UPS than UPS+TLFS and BPS during extension/flexion, lateral bending and axial rotation, suggesting its compromised stability.
INTERPRETATION: The hybrid construct of UPS+TLFS showed instant and long-term equivalent biomechanical ability to that of traditional BPS, making it an alternative option to BPS that could be less invasive while maintains a stable and effective instrumentation.
METHODS: Twenty-four porcine spines (L2-L5) were tested for flexibility with pure moments of 5Nm under intact status and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion status using UPS+TLFS, UPS or BPS at L3-L4. After short-term (3cycles) and long-term cyclic loading (18,000cycles), the range of motion was obtained and analyzed for single-level constructs in flexion/extension, lateral bending and axial rotation modes. In addition, the relative displacement of contralateral articular processes was recorded in a real time fashion.
FINDINGS: The range of motion was significantly reduced in all instrumented constructs. In all movement directions, UPS+TLFS achieved similar range of motion to BPS after short and long-term loading, which were significantly lower than that in UPS. A significantly larger displacement of contralateral articular process was recorded in UPS than UPS+TLFS and BPS during extension/flexion, lateral bending and axial rotation, suggesting its compromised stability.
INTERPRETATION: The hybrid construct of UPS+TLFS showed instant and long-term equivalent biomechanical ability to that of traditional BPS, making it an alternative option to BPS that could be less invasive while maintains a stable and effective instrumentation.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app