We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Internal mouthpiece designs as a future perspective for enhanced aerosol deposition. Comparative results for aerosol chemotherapy and aerosol antibiotics.
International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2013 November 19
BACKGROUND: In an effort to identify factors producing a finest mist from Jet-Nebulizers we designed 2 mouthpieces with 4 different internal designs and 1-3 compartments.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten different drugs previous used with their "ideal" combination of jet-nebulizer, residual-cup and loading were used. For each drug the mass median aerodynamic diameter size had been established along with their "ideal" combination.
RESULTS: For both mouthpiece, drug was the most important factor due the high F-values (Flarge=251.7, p<0.001 and Fsmall=60.1, p<0.001) produced. The design affected the droplet size but only for large mouthpiece (Flarge=5.99, p=0.001, Fsmall=1.72, p=0.178). Cross designs create the smallest droplets (2.271) so differing from the other designs whose mean droplets were greater and equal ranging between 2.39 and 2.447. The number of compartments in the two devices regarding the 10 drugs was found not statistically significant (p-values 0.768 and 0.532 respectively). Interaction effects between drugs and design were statistically significant for both devices (Flarge=8.87, p<0.001, Fsmall=5.33, p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Based on our experiment we conclude that further improvement of the drugs intended for aerosol production is needed. In addition, the mouthpiece design and size play an important role in further enhancing the fine mist production and therefore further experimentation is needed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten different drugs previous used with their "ideal" combination of jet-nebulizer, residual-cup and loading were used. For each drug the mass median aerodynamic diameter size had been established along with their "ideal" combination.
RESULTS: For both mouthpiece, drug was the most important factor due the high F-values (Flarge=251.7, p<0.001 and Fsmall=60.1, p<0.001) produced. The design affected the droplet size but only for large mouthpiece (Flarge=5.99, p=0.001, Fsmall=1.72, p=0.178). Cross designs create the smallest droplets (2.271) so differing from the other designs whose mean droplets were greater and equal ranging between 2.39 and 2.447. The number of compartments in the two devices regarding the 10 drugs was found not statistically significant (p-values 0.768 and 0.532 respectively). Interaction effects between drugs and design were statistically significant for both devices (Flarge=8.87, p<0.001, Fsmall=5.33, p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Based on our experiment we conclude that further improvement of the drugs intended for aerosol production is needed. In addition, the mouthpiece design and size play an important role in further enhancing the fine mist production and therefore further experimentation is needed.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app