Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

β-blockers and volatile anesthetics may attenuate cardioprotection by remote preconditioning in adult cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of 15 randomized trials.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical trials on cardioprotection by remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) for adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery revealed mixed results. Previous meta-analyses have been conducted and found marked heterogeneity among studies. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the factors affecting cardioprotection by remote preconditioning in adult cardiac surgery.

DESIGN: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

SETTING: University hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS: Adult subjects undergoing cardiac surgery.

INTERVENTIONS: RIPC.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fifteen trials with a total of 1,155 study patients reporting postoperative myocardial biomarker (CK-MB or troponin) levels were identified from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (up to July 2012). Compared with controls, RIPC significantly reduced postoperative biomarkers of myocardial injury (standardized mean difference = -0.31, p = 0.041; heterogeneity test: I(2) = 83.5%). This effect seemed more significant in valve surgery (standardized mean difference = -0.74, p = 0.002) than in coronary artery surgery (standardized mean difference = -0.23; p = 0.17). Univariate meta-regression analyses suggested that the major sources of significant heterogeneity were β-blockers (%) (coefficient = 0.0161, p = 0.022, adjusted R(2) = 0.37) and volatile anesthetics (coefficient = 0.6617, p = 0.065, adjusted R(2) = 0.22). These results were further confirmed in multivariate regression and subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSIONS: Available data from this meta-analysis further confirmed the cardioprotection conferred by RIPC in adult cardiac surgery. Moreover, the cardioprotective effect may be attenuated when combined with β-blockers or volatile anesthetics.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app