Journal Article
Validation Studies
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Validation of contemporary stroke and bleeding risk stratification scores in non-anticoagulated Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Risk stratification schemes assessing stroke and thromboembolism (stroke/TE) and bleeding relating to atrial fibrillation (AF) have largely been derived and validated in Western populations. We assessed risk factors that constitute scores for assessing stroke/TE (CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc) and bleeding (HAS-BLED), and the predictive value of these scores in a large cohort of Chinese patients with AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 1034 AF patients (27.1% female, median age 75; 85.6% non-anticoagulated) with mean follow-up of 1.9 years. On multivariate analysis, vascular disease was independently associated with stroke/TE in non-anticoagulated patients (p=0.04). In patients with a CHADS2 or CHA2DS2-VASc score=1, the rate of stroke/TE was 2.9% and 0.9% respectively, but in patients at "high risk" (scores ≥ 2), this rate was 4.6% and 4.5%, respectively. The c-statistics for predicting stroke/TE with CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc were 0.58 (p=0.109) and 0.72 (p<0.001), respectively. Compared to CHADS2, the use of CHA2DS2-VASc would result in a Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) of 16.6% (p=0.009) and an Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI) of 1.1% (p=0.002). Cumulative survival of the patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score≥2 was decreased compared to those with a CHA2DS2-VASc score 0-1 (p<0.001), but the CHADS2 was not predictive of mortality. There was an increased risk of major bleeding with increasing HAS-BLED score (c-statistic 0.61, 95% CI: 0.51-0.71, p=0.042).

CONCLUSIONS: Vascular disease was a strong independent predictor of stroke/TE in Chinese patients with AF. The CHA2DS2-VASc score performed better than CHADS2 in predicting stroke/TE in this Chinese AF population. Cumulative survival of the patients at high risk with the CHA2DS2-VASc score (but not using CHADS2) was significantly decreased.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app