Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Early clinical experience with a candidate meningococcal B recombinant vaccine (rMenB) in healthy adults.

Human Vaccines 2011 July
BACKGROUND: The development of a broadly protective vaccine against meningococcal serogroup B is a well-recognized public health need. Whole-genome sequencing was used to identify meningococcal surface proteins that are conserved across strains. These proteins were incorporated into two investigational vaccines.

METHODS: Three randomized studies were performed to evaluate a three-component recombinant meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (rMenB) and rMenB plus outer membrane vesicles from the Norwegian outbreak strain 44/76 (rMenB+OMVNW). Participants were randomized to receive 3 or 4 doses of rMenB or rMenB+OMVNW or control vaccines and provided sera for exploratory immunogenicity testing against a panel of meningococcal serogroup B strains. A booster dose was administered 12 months after the initial primary series in one of the studies. The control cohort received a licensed quadrivalent meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine against serogroups A, C, W-135 and Y as well as hepatitis B vaccine as safety comparators. Solicited reactions within 7 days of any vaccination and adverse events throughout the studies were recorded.

RESULTS: One hundred four participants enrolled into the clinical trials. Both rMenB and rMenB+OMVNW induced immune responses to multiple serogroup B strains in the majority of participants. Compared with rMenB, rMenB+OMVNW appeared somewhat more immunogenic and reactogenic; the study was not adequately powered for statistical assessment of these small differences. Both investigational vaccines were more reactogenic than the licensed vaccines. Few vaccinees discontinued any study due to reactogenicity to any study vaccine administered.

CONCLUSION: Based on the immunogenicity and reactogenicity results in these participants, both rMenB and rMenB+OMVNW were promising candidates for further investigation.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app