We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block: spread of solution and clinical effect.
Pain Medicine 2011 August
OBJECTIVES: We investigated the clinical effects and accuracy of ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block. Additionally, spinal level and spread of injected solution were confirmed by anatomic dissection of fresh cadavers. DESIGN SETTING, PATIENTS, AND INTERVENTIONS: Twelve patients diagnosed with mono-radiculopathy between C5-7 underwent ultrasound-guided nerve root block. An insulated needle was advanced with an in-plane approach using nerve stimulation and 2 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine with 4 mg of dexamethasone was injected using nerve stimulation. Ultrasound-guided C5-7 nerve root block was also performed in ten fresh cadavers. Blue dye (2 mL) was injected onto each nerve root and anatomic dissection was performed to confirm the exact spinal level and spread pattern of the dye.
RESULTS: Pain score before the procedure (65 [46-80], median [interquartile range]) was decreased to 25 [3-31] at 24 hours (P = 0.003) and 40 [28-66] at 30 days (P = 0.02) after the root block. Obvious side effects were not seen. All target nerve roots in patients and cadavers were correctly identified by ultrasound imaging. The needle tip did not reach the pedicle of the vertebral arch in the anteroposterior view of fluoroscopy, and spread pattern of contrast medium was extraforaminal and extraneural.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that injected solution by ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block mainly spreads to the extraforaminal direction compared with conventional fluoroscopic technique. Therefore, present clinical study involves possibility of safer selective nerve root block with sufficient analgesic effects by ultrasound guidance, despite the absence of intraforaminal epidural spread of solution.
RESULTS: Pain score before the procedure (65 [46-80], median [interquartile range]) was decreased to 25 [3-31] at 24 hours (P = 0.003) and 40 [28-66] at 30 days (P = 0.02) after the root block. Obvious side effects were not seen. All target nerve roots in patients and cadavers were correctly identified by ultrasound imaging. The needle tip did not reach the pedicle of the vertebral arch in the anteroposterior view of fluoroscopy, and spread pattern of contrast medium was extraforaminal and extraneural.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that injected solution by ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block mainly spreads to the extraforaminal direction compared with conventional fluoroscopic technique. Therefore, present clinical study involves possibility of safer selective nerve root block with sufficient analgesic effects by ultrasound guidance, despite the absence of intraforaminal epidural spread of solution.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app