Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Patterns of psychotropic medication use in nursing homes: surveys in Sydney, allowing comparisons over time and between countries.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore changes in patterns of use of psychotropic medication in Sydney nursing homes over recent years, and to compare current usage rates with those reported from other countries.

METHODS: Data were obtained from 44 of the 48 nursing homes in a central Sydney health area. Researchers noted details from medication cards concerning residents' age, gender and all currently prescribed drugs, checking whether medication had been given as prescribed. Frequency of administration of "as required" drugs in the previous four weeks was noted.

RESULTS: The pattern of use of psychotropic medication changed considerably between 1993 and 2009. The number of residents taking regularly administered antipsychotics increased by 24% during 1998-2009, though mean dosages decreased. In 2009, fewer residents took hypnotic and/or anxiolytic medications than in the 1990s, and fewer than in countries from which equivalent data have been reported. Antidepressant use increased over the 16 years but only to 25.6%. Only 3% of residents in Sydney nursing homes in 2009 took cognition-enhancing drugs.

CONCLUSIONS: Compared to other countries, rates of use of hypnotic, anxiolytic and antidepressant medication in Sydney nursing homes are low. Benefits and disadvantages of these differences merit analysis. Antipsychotic medications were administered to similar percentages of survey residents in 1993 and 2009, but at lower mean dosages in 2009 compared to previous surveys, and with a change to using mainly atypical antipsychotic drugs. Compared to various other countries, cognition-enhancing and antidepressant medications are administered to proportionally fewer residents in Sydney nursing homes. Outcome analysis regarding the use and benefits of such drugs in nursing homes is desirable.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app