Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A narrative review on women and cardiac rehabilitation: program adherence and preferences for alternative models of care.

Maturitas 2010 November
Despite the preponderance of evidence on the numerous benefits of CR, it remains largely under-utilized in women. The objective of this narrative review was to summarize and synthesize the literature on women and CR with regard to outcomes, adherence, and preferences for alternative models of CR. Studies of the effectiveness of CR have generally revealed no major differences between men and women. However, female-specific data are lacking on the effect of CR on mortality and morbidity. Research suggests that women and men may be equally likely to prefer home-based to hospital-based CR services. Women's preferences for and outcomes in, women-only CR are beginning to be uncovered. Discussing program model options with female cardiac patients and referring to preferred types may be the appropriate approach until further evidence is available.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app