Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase variability in renal transplant patients on long-term mycophenolate mofetil therapy.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: * Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is a potent, selective and reversible inhibitor of inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), the rate-limiting enzyme for de novo guanosine triphosphate biosynthesis. * The large IMPDH interindividual variability could be responsible for the differences in therapeutic effects and side-effects observed with MPA. * Induction of IMPDH activity has been observed in whole blood during immunosuppressive therapy.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: * Our data were acquired in long-term mycophenolate mofetil-treated renal transplant recipients on different combinations of immunosuppressive agents (ciclosporin, tacrolimus, sirolimus) and with different treatment duration (up to 8.8 years post transplant). * The increasing trend in IMPDH activity that we observed throughout our 12-month observation period was significantly higher in rejecting than in nonrejecting subjects.

AIMS: Long-term mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) therapy may induce inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), thus decreasing MMF immunosuppressive properties. Pharmacodynamic monitoring was used to investigate whether biological activity is altered after long-term therapy.

METHODS: IMPDH activity was measured in PBMC samples from 54 stable kidney transplant patients, already on MMF (for at least 3 months), before (t(0)) and 2 h after (t(2)) MMF morning dose administration; levels were monitored for up to 15 months, together with total mycophenolic acid (MPA) and free MPA concentrations.

RESULTS: During the 15 months' monitoring, t(0) IMPDH activity in transplant recipients increased from 5.9 +/- 3.7 nmol h(-1) mg(-1)[95% confidence interval (CI) 4.9, 6.9] to 9.0 +/- 3.9 nmol h(-1) mg(-1) (95% CI 7.2, 10.8), with an intra- and interpatient variability of 28% and 42%. Five patients experienced acute rejection during the follow-up: t(0) IMPDH activity was increased during rejection vs. nonrejection, and the trend was significantly higher in rejecting than in nonrejecting subjects for the whole monitoring period.

CONCLUSIONS: Even though a correlation has been found between IMPDH activity and rejection, its efficacy as a predictive tool in long-term transplant outcomes may be affected by high interpatient variability; on the other hand, continuous monitoring of the IMPDH trend could make an effective prognostic parameter of rejection. Other trials also including pre-transplant data on both IMPDH expression and activity are warranted to better assess their role as biomarkers for MPA effect in clinical practice.