Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Long-term outcomes of repeat vs initial trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term intraocular pressure (IOP) control and to identify risk factors for failure of repeat trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (MMC) in patients with open-angle glaucoma.

DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study.

METHODS: Seventy-five eyes (67 patients) that had undergone repeat trabeculectomy with MMC were matched to 75 eyes (64 patients) that had undergone initial trabeculectomy with MMC according to age, gender, race, diagnosis, preoperative IOP, number of glaucoma medications, and lens status in an institutional setting. Surgical successes were defined as: 1) IOP < or =18 mm Hg and > or = 20% reduction in IOP, 2) < or = 15 mm Hg IOP and > or = 25% reduction in IOP, and 3) < or = 12 mm Hg IOP and > or = 30% reduction in IOP from baseline, with or without glaucoma medications, and were assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. Risk factors for failure in the repeat trabeculectomy group were analyzed by the Cox proportional hazard regression model. The main outcome measures were success rate, number of medications, and visual acuity.

RESULTS: Eyes that underwent initial trabeculectomy with MMC had a statistically significantly higher cumulative surgical success rate than those that underwent repeat trabeculectomy with MMC at 3 years according to criteria B (61.3% vs 41.3%; P = .022) and C (52.0% vs 32.0%; P = .021). In eyes that underwent repeat trabeculectomy, younger age and requirement of laser suture lysis were significant risk factors for surgical failure. Eyes that underwent initial trabeculectomy required a statistically fewer number of medications than eyes that underwent repeat trabeculectomy (0.6 vs 1.2; P = .013).

CONCLUSIONS: Repeat trabeculectomy with MMC is less successful at achieving IOP reduction in open-angle glaucoma than is initial trabeculectomy with MMC at 3 years or more.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app