We have located links that may give you full text access.
Pulmonary rehabilitation is successful for COPD irrespective of MRC dyspnoea grade.
Respiratory Medicine 2009 July
BACKGROUND: It is not clear whether the benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) apply equally to patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with different levels of starting disability. We have therefore investigated the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation stratified by the MRC dyspnoea scale in patients with COPD.
METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational study of data collected from 450 consecutive patients with COPD attending outpatient PR: 247 male, mean (SD) age 69.5 (8.9) yrs and FEV(1) 44.6 (19.7)% predicted. The Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT) was performed before and after the seven-week course
RESULTS: 395 patients (88%) completed the programme. The mean (SD) baseline ISWT performance was 167 (113)m. The distribution of baseline MRC grades was 2 - 15.4%, 3 - 24.9%, 4 - 27.3% and 5 - 32.4%. The mean (95% CI) improvement in ISWT after PR for each MRC scale grade was highly significant (p<0.0005); 2 - 66 (50-83)m, 3 - 63 (50-75)m, 4 - 59 (49-70)m, and 5 - 54 (43-64)m.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with COPD, of all MRC dyspnoea grades, benefit comparably from pulmonary rehabilitation achieving both statistically and clinically meaningful improvements in exercise performance. MRC grade should therefore not be used to exclude patients from pulmonary rehabilitation.
METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational study of data collected from 450 consecutive patients with COPD attending outpatient PR: 247 male, mean (SD) age 69.5 (8.9) yrs and FEV(1) 44.6 (19.7)% predicted. The Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT) was performed before and after the seven-week course
RESULTS: 395 patients (88%) completed the programme. The mean (SD) baseline ISWT performance was 167 (113)m. The distribution of baseline MRC grades was 2 - 15.4%, 3 - 24.9%, 4 - 27.3% and 5 - 32.4%. The mean (95% CI) improvement in ISWT after PR for each MRC scale grade was highly significant (p<0.0005); 2 - 66 (50-83)m, 3 - 63 (50-75)m, 4 - 59 (49-70)m, and 5 - 54 (43-64)m.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with COPD, of all MRC dyspnoea grades, benefit comparably from pulmonary rehabilitation achieving both statistically and clinically meaningful improvements in exercise performance. MRC grade should therefore not be used to exclude patients from pulmonary rehabilitation.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app