We have located links that may give you full text access.
N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide predicts adverse outcomes in acute-myocardial infarction even with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.
Indian Heart Journal 2006 March
BACKGROUND: Risk stratification of patients with acute myocardial infarction is based on various clinical, biochemical or electrocardiographic parameters. There is emerging evidence that N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptides (NT-proBNP) possess characteristics of an ideal biomarker. In this study we looked into the role of NT-proBNP in risk stratification and prediction of short-term events in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and having preserved left ventricular functions as assessed by ejection fraction (EF) on echocardiography.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Of a total of 250 consecutive patients admitted with a diagnosis of acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction, 84 patients were found to have ejection fraction greater than 50% (44 with anterior MI, 40 with inferior MI. Serum NT-proBNP was measured using electrochemiluminiscence assay (Roche). On two-dimensional echocardiography, modified Simpson's technique was used to measure the EF. Follow-up at day 30 included a two-dimensional echocardiography and assessment for worsening heart failure, recurrent ischemia, and repeat hospitalization. Death due to cardiovascular cause by 30 days was also noted. The mean value of NT-proBNP for those having EF over 50% was 1542.38 + 4649.12 pg/ml. For the purpose of a dichotomous analysis, the median value was determined (907.5 pg/ml). In patients having NT-proBNP above median, the Killip class was expectedly higher 1.62 + 0.21 vs 1.0 + 0.12 ( p< 0.05) and the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction scores were worse (4.77 + 1.56 vs 2.71 + 1.11, p < 0.05). The ejection fraction was similar (59.72 + 8.8 vs 58.76 + 6.9, p= NS) in the two groups. At 30 days followup, patients having NT-proBNP above median showed a further decline in the Killip class and EF. The clinical outcomes (composite of recurrent ischemia, worsening heart failure and repeat hospitalization) were also worse in this group ( p< 0.05).
CONCLUSION: In patients with apparently normal ejection fraction and without left ventricular dysfunction, a higher NT-proBNP level would suggest poorer short-term clinical outcomes and would require a more aggressive treatment strategy.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Of a total of 250 consecutive patients admitted with a diagnosis of acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction, 84 patients were found to have ejection fraction greater than 50% (44 with anterior MI, 40 with inferior MI. Serum NT-proBNP was measured using electrochemiluminiscence assay (Roche). On two-dimensional echocardiography, modified Simpson's technique was used to measure the EF. Follow-up at day 30 included a two-dimensional echocardiography and assessment for worsening heart failure, recurrent ischemia, and repeat hospitalization. Death due to cardiovascular cause by 30 days was also noted. The mean value of NT-proBNP for those having EF over 50% was 1542.38 + 4649.12 pg/ml. For the purpose of a dichotomous analysis, the median value was determined (907.5 pg/ml). In patients having NT-proBNP above median, the Killip class was expectedly higher 1.62 + 0.21 vs 1.0 + 0.12 ( p< 0.05) and the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction scores were worse (4.77 + 1.56 vs 2.71 + 1.11, p < 0.05). The ejection fraction was similar (59.72 + 8.8 vs 58.76 + 6.9, p= NS) in the two groups. At 30 days followup, patients having NT-proBNP above median showed a further decline in the Killip class and EF. The clinical outcomes (composite of recurrent ischemia, worsening heart failure and repeat hospitalization) were also worse in this group ( p< 0.05).
CONCLUSION: In patients with apparently normal ejection fraction and without left ventricular dysfunction, a higher NT-proBNP level would suggest poorer short-term clinical outcomes and would require a more aggressive treatment strategy.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app